The author predicted body mass of modern Japanese in Kanto region based on skeletal specimen (birth year: 1851 to 1928) stored at the dissecting room of Chiba University and the Jikei University by using a couple of equations of femoral head vertical diameters (FHD method) and the product of diaphysial sagittal and transverse diameters at the femoral subtrochanteric level (FSTpr method). In order to examine the validity of each estimation method in the Japanese skeletons, the author compared these raw estimated values with annually-reported body weight data in early 20’s adults by Baelz (1885), Meiji Life Insurance (1885, 1894 and 1895), Miwa (1893), the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture (since 1900), and the Ministry of Health and Welfare (since 1947). The results indicated that all the estimated body mass was considerably larger than the corresponding annual data in excess of diurnal variation or seasonal fluctuation, and the errors were especially large by the FHD method in male. The body mass index (BMI) calculated from the estimated body mass and stature was higher in average, and the more individuals were categorized as overweight than the actual data of recent Japanese people. It is pointed out that the reasons why the previous estimating equations are not suitable for the Japanese skeleton are that many European-based groups used in the basic data for each method were different in the BMI and those BMI values were excessively larger than that of the past Japanese, in addition to the temporal and generational differences. For more reasonable estimation of body mass for the Japanese skeleton, it is necessary to prepare equations based on the Japanese somatometric data.
View full abstract