The results described below were obtained by a combination therapy study group which was organized to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the new monobactam antibiotic azthreonam (AZT) used in combination with clindamycin (CLDM) in the treatment of respiratory infections.
[Experimental findings]
1.Antimicrobial activity: AZT, when used in combination with CLDM, showed antimicrobial activity against all 32 standard strains of gram-negative or positive organisms, resulting in an enlargement of its antimicrobial spectrum.The combined use of the two drugs resulted in a slight summation or potentiation in the case of
S.aureus, E.coil, K.pneumoniae and
E.cloacas, while a well-defined potentiation was observed with
S.marcescens.An antagonistic effect was produced against most of the
P.aeruginosa strains.
2.Effects of the combination on each drug: An unpleasant smell was noted for CLDM upon dissolution. However, the combination resulted in no changes in color or potency of either drug.
[Clinical findings]
As a rule, 1g×2/day of AZT and 600mg×2/day of CLDM were administered to inpatients withwell-defind respiratory infections.The drugs were administered either separately or as a mixture by D.I.Treatment was continued for 7 to 14 days.
1. Of the 102 enrolled cases of respiratory infections, 90 were retained for evaluation of the clinical efficacy.
2. Of the 90 retained patients, 60 were males and 30 females.Sixty-one patients (67.8%) were aged 60 and over and 69 (76.7%) had underlying diseases, which were moderate or severe in 56 cases (62.2%). Infections were found to be moderate or severe in 81 cases (93.1%, if calculated excluding 3 unknown cases).Infections were thus severe or refractory in a great majority of patients.
3.The combination therapy was found to be effective in 20 of 30 cases (66.7%) of chronic respi ratory tract infections, in 28 of 45 cases (62.2%) of pneumonia and in 8 of 9 cases (88.9%) of suppurative diseases of the lung, resulting in an efficacy rate of 66.7%(60/90 cases) on the whole.
4.The efficacy rate was 76.2%(16/21 cases) and 63.8%(44/69 cases) in the absence and presence of underlying diseases, respectively.The difference between the two rates was statistically significant.
5.The combination therapy was found to be effective in 15 of 26 cases (57.7%) where only gramnegative rods were isolated and 70.0%(7/10 cases) were only gram-positive cocci were isolated. Two or more organisms were detected in 15 cases for which an efficacy rate of 66.7%(10 cases) was obtained.
6.The combination therapy eradicated 37 of 44 (84.1%) strains of gram-negative rods and 12 of 14 (85.7%) of gram-positive cocci, resulting in an eradication rate of 85.5%(53/62 trains) on the whole.The microbiological efficacy rates were thus higher than the clinical efficacy rates.
7. Side effects occurred in 15 cases, including rash or skin eruption in 7, diarrhea in 2 and bitter taste in 3. One patient had facial edema, flushing and hypotension which seemed to be associated with CLDM and probably with an accelerated rate of infusion.These symptoms subsided promptly upon discontinuation of the treatment.
8.Major abnormal laboratory findings were transient elevations in S-GOT and S-GPT. Eosinophils also elevated in a few cases.The incidence of abnormal laboratory findings was relatively high (31.4% or 32/102 cases).
9.The attending physicians evaluated the combination “very useful” in 7 cases, “useful” in 43, slightly useful in 26, “not useful” in 18 and “unknown” in 8.
View full abstract