A well-controlled comparative study was performed using ceftizoxime (CZX) as the control drug to objectively evaluate the efficacy, safety and usefulness of cefotaxime (CTX) in postoperative infections. Both antibiotics were administered intravenously by drip infusion at 2g/day in two divided doses, and the following results were obtained.
1. Overall clinical efficacy rates, based on assessment by the Efficacy Evaluation Committee, were 84.5%(60/71) in the CTX group and 75.7%(56/74) in the CZX group in postoperative wound infections (Trial A), and 73.7%(42/57) in the CTX group and 68.4%(39/57) in the CZX group in postoperative abdominal cavity infections and postoperative dead space infections (Trial B). No significant difference was found between the two treatment groups in either Trial A or Trial B.
2. Final overall improvement rates evaluated by the surgeons were 76.1%(54/71) in the CTX group and 74.3%(55/74) in the CZX group in Trial A, and 64.9%(37/57) in the CTX group and 57.9%(33/57) in the CZX group in Trial B. No significant difference was found between the two treatment groups in either Trial A or Trial B.
3. Bacteriological effectiveness was judged by the Efficacy Evaluation Committee. Pathogen eradication rates by case were 69.5%(41/59) in the CTX group and 52.6%(30/57) in the CZX group in Trial A, with CTX tending to be more effective. In Trial B, however, the rates were 52.2%(24/46) in the CTX group and 42.6%(20/47) in the CZX group, with no significant difference between the two treatment groups.
The eradication rate by bacterial species based on the growth and decline of the bacteria clinically isolated before administration was 73.3%(66/90) in the CTX group and 56.8%(54/95) in the CZX group in Trial A, while, in Trial B, the rates were 51.4%(37/72) in the CTX group and 33.0%(31/94) the CZX group, the CTX group exhibiting statistically significant better results in both Trials A and B (P<0.05).
4. Side effects were not observed in the CTX group but were reported in 4 out of 150 cases (2.7%) in the CZX group. Abnormal laboratory findings were observed in 1.4%(2/144) of the cases in the CTX group and in 4.1%(6/147) of the cases in the CZX group. However, no significant differences were found between the two treatment groups either in side effects or abnormal laboratory findings.
5. The usefulness was judged by the surgeons to be 66.7%(46/71) in the CTX group and 58.3%(42/74) in the CZX group in Trial A, and 54.5%(30/55) in the CTX group and 42.3%(22/52) in the CZX group in Trial B, with no significant difference between the two treatment groups in either Trial A or Trial B.
From the above results, CTX may be considered to be at least as highly useful as CZX in the treatment of postoperative infections.
View full abstract