Histological and cytological studies were performed on 22 cases of regenerated testis in the White Leghorn breed obtained from bilateral castration 60 days after hatching.
The mechanism of formation of the seminiferous tubules is summarized as follows.
In the first stage of regeneration, spaces in the loose connective tissue which contains fibroblasts are expanded and fibroblasts situated in the peripheral region are arranged in a circle, so that the origin of the seminiferous tubule may be produced. In such seminiferous tubule, an annular struct-ure of the basement membrane is opened to the interstitial tissue on account of loose connection among fibroblasts, which penetrate through this part, and one of the cytoplasmic processes attaches to the inside of the basement membrane. A fibroblast differentiates to Sertoli cell with the completion of the basement membrane, so that an immature type of seminiferous tubule may be produced.
Also in each regenerated testis which developed to a stage of spermatogenesis according to such formula of formation of seminiferous tubule, beneath the tunica albuginea, and in the adjacent part of the septula-testis-like connective tissue layer penetrating from the tunica albuginea into the inside of the testicular tissue, most immature seminiferous tubules are observed. A typical case is shown in example 7 (Fig. 8). Gradual development of the seminiferous tubule going toward the center of the testis from the tunica albuginea is understood from Fig. 24.
Namely, the inner layer of the tunica albuginea consisting of thick connective tissue changes into loose connective tissue, the stage of development of its mesh varies with the direction toward the inner part of the regenerated testis, and the number of cells situated in the lumen increases as the meshes become larger.
However, in the cells situated in the lumen, no mitotic figures can be observed. This fact seems to show that the connective tissue cells constituting the tunica albuginea and the layer of septula-testis-like connective tissue differentiate in two directions, one being that of the cells in the tubule and the other that of the wall cells, with the increase in the tubular diameter.
When the regenerated testis makes further development, it is suggested that, in consequence of the development of undifferentiated seminiferous tubules situated in such part, the regenerated testis is caused to increase in volume.
Hooker and Cunningham stated that a true regenerated testis might be distinguished from a hypertrophied testis, both anatomically and histologically, by examining a fragment of testicular tissue left after incomplete castration.
It seems to be difficult to make any clear distinction between a regenerated testis and a fragment of a hypertrophied one.
All the regenerated testes, except a few, obtained by the author were not pending by the mesorchium in the abdominal cavity nor deforming the kidney, but were covered with the peritoneum.
Regenerated testes protrude into the abdominal cavity. According to Hooker and Cunningham's classification, the regenerated testes used in this experiment are rather hypertrophied fragments. However, the histological structure of the author's materials resembles that of the regenerated testes studied by these authors.
Hooker and Cunningham described that somatic cells could be transformed into germ cells. The present author also wishes to support their suggestion when discussion is made in accordance with the present cytological method.
What is more important, however, is a factor that makes a cell regarded as fibroblast differentiate into a germ cell. Unless this problem is elucidated, it may be impossible to make clear the origin of germ cell also in a regenerated testis.
In many regenerated testes, sloughing of spermatogenic cells has been observed.
View full abstract