Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan
Online ISSN : 1884-1287
Print ISSN : 0578-0969
Search
Advanced search
OR
Browse
Search
[English version not available]
Displaying 1-9 of 9 articles from this issue
Show all abstracts
    • |<
    • <
    • 1
    • >
    • >|
  • [title in Japanese]
    [in Japanese]
    1997 Volume 1997 Issue 244 Pages 12-22
    Published: October 25, 1997
    Released on J-STAGE: March 19, 2010
    DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7131/chuugokugogaku.1997.12
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Download PDF (1513K)
  • [title in Japanese]
    [in Japanese]
    1997 Volume 1997 Issue 244 Pages 43-53
    Published: October 25, 1997
    Released on J-STAGE: November 26, 2010
    DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7131/chuugokugogaku.1997.43
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Show abstractHide abstract
    The following points will be clarify in this study.
    1) Chinese bare noun are definite nouns. Chinese numeral phrases (numeral+mesure word+noun) are indefinite nouns. Chinese numeral phrases areused in opposition to bare nouns. The numeral phrase is chosen by thespeaker, but it is unknown to the listener.
    Therefore, in Chinese, numeral phrases become an indefinite marker. Contrasting to this, the definite marker is the bare noun.
    2) In Chinese, a numeral phrase shows indefinite article, but when ittakes the numeral “1”, it sometimes shows generality.
    3) Numeral phrases include two interpretations; specific and nonspecific.
    4) The object in the “ba” construction that takes numeral phrases has beentreated as an exception, but it can be enough explained in terms of thenumeral phrase's generality and specificity.
    View full abstract
    Download PDF (1467K)
  • [title in Japanese]
    [in Japanese]
    1997 Volume 1997 Issue 244 Pages 63-71
    Published: October 25, 1997
    Released on J-STAGE: July 27, 2010
    DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7131/chuugokugogaku.1997.63
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Show abstractHide abstract
    Third person pronoun “_??_” which is used for objects except animate has some more grammatical restrictions than “_??_/_??_” for a human does, however, the practical study has hardly been done yet.
    Here in this paper, for trial, the categorization between Third person pronoun “_??_” and Demonstrative pronoun “_??_/_??_” should be made clearly.
    Moreover, I would like to state my opinion on some distinctive tendencies, such as the congenial of “_??_” and “_??_” sentence.
    View full abstract
    Download PDF (1067K)
  • [title in Japanese]
    [in Japanese]
    1997 Volume 1997 Issue 244 Pages 81-92
    Published: October 25, 1997
    Released on J-STAGE: March 19, 2010
    DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7131/chuugokugogaku.1997.81
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Download PDF (10278K)
  • [title in Japanese]
    [in Japanese]
    1997 Volume 1997 Issue 244 Pages 93-103
    Published: October 25, 1997
    Released on J-STAGE: March 19, 2010
    DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7131/chuugokugogaku.1997.93
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Download PDF (1534K)
  • [title in Japanese]
    [in Japanese]
    1997 Volume 1997 Issue 244 Pages 114-123
    Published: October 25, 1997
    Released on J-STAGE: November 26, 2010
    DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7131/chuugokugogaku.1997.114
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Download PDF (4920K)
  • [title in Japanese]
    [in Japanese]
    1997 Volume 1997 Issue 244 Pages 124-131
    Published: October 25, 1997
    Released on J-STAGE: November 26, 2010
    DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7131/chuugokugogaku.1997.124
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Download PDF (1012K)
  • [title in Japanese]
    [in Japanese]
    1997 Volume 1997 Issue 244 Pages 132-140
    Published: October 25, 1997
    Released on J-STAGE: March 19, 2010
    DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7131/chuugokugogaku.1997.132
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Show abstractHide abstract
    Place deixis differs from language to language. The Japanese demonstrative system uses three-way distioctions: proximal KO, medial SO and distal A. Chinese has two, ZHE / NA. Some grammarians point out that the place deixis system of each language reflects speaker and hearer's territorial sense of space in conversation.
    This paper examines the relationship between Chinese locational demonstrativer ZHER/NAR and motion verbs LAI/QU, and compare them with Japanese locational demonstratives KOKO/SOKO/ASOKO and motion verb KURU/IKU. This research offers an important key to an understanding pragmatic differences between Japanese and Chinese motion verbs.
    View full abstract
    Download PDF (1229K)
  • [title in Japanese]
    [in Japanese]
    1997 Volume 1997 Issue 244 Pages 171-180
    Published: October 25, 1997
    Released on J-STAGE: March 19, 2010
    DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7131/chuugokugogaku.1997.171
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Download PDF (1311K)
    • |<
    • <
    • 1
    • >
    • >|
feedback
 Top