Background: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has a high mortality rate, and cardiac rehabilitation programs (CRP) reduce HFrEF rehospitalization and mortality rates. Some countries attempt 3 weeks of inpatient CRP (3w In-CRP) for cardiac diseases. However, whether 3w In-CRP reduces the prognostic parameter of the Metabolic Exercise data combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes (MECKI) score is unknown. Therefore, we investigated whether 3w In-CRP improves MECKI scores in patients with HFrEF.

Methods and Results: This study enrolled 53 patients with HFrEF who participated in 30 inpatient CRP sessions, consisting of 30 min of aerobic exercise twice daily, 5 days a week for 3 weeks, between 2019 and 2022. Cardiopulmonary exercise tests and transthoracic echocardiography were performed, and blood samples were collected, before and after 3w In-CRP. MECKI scores and cardiovascular (CV) events (heart failure rehospitalization or death) were evaluated. The MECKI score improved from a median 23.34% (interquartile range [IQR] 10.21–53.14%) before 3w In-CRP to 18.66% (IQR 6.54–39.94%; P<0.01) after 3w In-CRP because of improved left ventricular ejection fraction and percentage peak oxygen uptake. Patients’ improved MECKI scores corresponded with reduced CV events. However, patients who experienced CV events did not have improved MECKI scores.

Conclusions: In this study, 3w In-CRP improved MECKI scores and reduced CV events for patients with HFrEF. However, patients whose MECKI scores did not improve despite 3w In-CRP require careful heart failure management.

Background: The incidence of heart failure (HF) is increasing, and the mortality from HF remains high in an aging society. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs (CRP) increase oxygen uptake (V̇O₂) and reduce HF rehospitalization and mortality. Therefore, CR is recommended for every HF patient. However, the number of outpatients undergoing CR remains low, with insufficient attendance at CRP sessions. In this study we evaluated the outcomes of 3 weeks of inpatient CRP (3w In-CRP) for HF patients.

Methods and Results: This study enrolled 93 HF patients after acute-phase hospitalization between 2019 and 2022. Patients participated in 30 sessions of 3w In-CRP (30 min aerobic exercise twice daily, 5 days/week). Before and after 3w In-CRP, patients underwent a cardiopulmonary exercise test, and cardiovascular (CV) events (mortality, HF rehospitalization, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular disease) after discharge were evaluated. After 3w In-CPR, mean (±SD) peak V̇O₂increased from 11.8±3.2 to 13.7±4.1 mL/min/kg (116.5±22.1%). During the follow-up period (357±292 days after discharge), 20 patients were rehospitalized for HF, 1 had a stroke, and 8 died for any reasons. Proportional hazard and Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated that CV events were reduced among patients with a 6.1% improvement in peak V̇O₂than in patients without any improvement in peak V̇O₂.

Conclusions: 3w In-CRP for HF patients improved peak V̇O₂and reduced CV events in HF patients with a 6.1% improvement in peak V̇O₂.

Background: In households with older individuals, where a patient is experiencing heart failure (HF), effective cooperation between patients and caregivers is crucial for disease management. However, there is limited evidence regarding the impact of cooperative HF management on the incidence of exacerbation. Therefore, the aim of this 6-month prospective cohort study was to investigate the association between HF management capability and exacerbations.

Methods and Results: The study enrolled outpatients (age ≥65 years) with chronic HF from a cardiology clinic and their caregivers. Self-care capabilities among patients and caregivers were evaluated using the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) and Caregiver Contribution-SCHFI, respectively. Total scores were calculated using the highest score for each item. During the follow-up period, 31 patients experienced worsening HF. The analysis revealed no significant association between the total HF management score and HF exacerbation among all eligible patients. However, in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), high HF management capability of the family unit was associated with a reduced risk of HF exacerbation, even after adjusting for the severity of HF.

Conclusions: In older patients with HF and preserved LVEF, effective HF management may contribute to a lower risk of exacerbations.

Background: Definitions of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) differ among guidelines. Any systemic histological finding of CS is essential for the diagnosis of CS in the 2014 Heart Rhythm Society statement, but not necessary in the Japanese Circulation Society 2016 guidelines. This study aimed to reveal the differences in outcomes by comparing 2 groups, namely CS patients with or without systemic histologically proven granuloma.

Methods and Results: This study retrospectively included 231 consecutive patients with CS. CS with granulomas in ≥1 organs was diagnosed in 131 patients (Group G), whereas CS without any granulomas was diagnosed in the remaining 100 patients (Group NG). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly reduced in Group NG compared with Group G (44±13% vs. 50±16%, respectively; P=0.001). However, Kaplan-Meier curves showed that major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)-free survival outcomes were comparable between the 2 groups (log-rank P=0.167). Univariable analyses showed that significant predictors of MACE were Groups G/NG, histological CS, LVEF, and high B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal pro BNP concentrations, but none of these was significant in multivariable analyses.

Conclusions: Overall risks of MACE were similar between the 2 groups despite different manifestations in cardiac dysfunction. The data not only validate the prognostic value of non-invasive diagnosis of CS, but also show the need for careful observation and therapeutic strategy in patients with CS without any granuloma.

Background: The Japanese Circulation Society survey revealed that Japanese female cardiologists exhibited a trend to refuse the chairperson position; however, the causal factors remain uncertain.

Methods and Results: We distributed a questionnaire survey among chairpersons of the Chugoku regional meeting in November 2022. The rate of chair acceptance at the annual meeting tended to increase as the chairperson’s experience grew (first time chairing a meeting, 25.0%; 2–3 times, 33.3%; 4–5 times, 53.8%; ≥6 times, 70.0%; P=0.021).

Conclusions: Providing inexperienced members with the chance to perform the role of chairperson will lead to them accepting to chair annual meetings.