Contrary to the received view that English does not allow head-internal relative clauses, I point out that it does in fact have such clauses. After giving a detailed syntactic description of the construction, we argue that head-internal relatives are made possible through three adjacent successive stages: first, the stage of head-external relatives, second, the stage of a bridge construction with double analysis available, i. e., there is a head-external relative that allows for a head-internal interpretation, and finally, the stage of pure head-internal relatives. This process is characteristically a type of extension in grammatical dynamism. It is shown, furthermore, that this analysis encompasses another domain of data and that it is theoretically rich and constrained.
抄録全体を表示