ENGLISH LINGUISTICS
Online ISSN : 1884-3107
Print ISSN : 0918-3701
ISSN-L : 0918-3701
26 巻, 2 号
選択された号の論文の14件中1~14を表示しています
Article
  • MANABU MIZUGUCHI
    2009 年 26 巻 2 号 p. 293-328
    発行日: 2009年
    公開日: 2013/10/07
    ジャーナル フリー
    This paper explores extraposition from NP and claims that it provides evidence for the cyclic model of derivations proposed in the recent Minimalist Program. We propose that an extraposed phrase, which is base-adjoined, is interpretively associated with its host in the semantic component via cyclic Transfer. We show that the proposed analysis can give a natural account to attested properties of extraposition. Through our investigation, we demonstrate that our proposal not only endorses a Minimalist view of syntactic derivations but also has theoretical consequences for the way CHL constructs derivations, proposing a more derivationally oriented phase theory. We also argue that the proposed analysis straightforwardly explains well-formed sub-extraction from subjects.
  • TAICHI NAKAMURA
    2009 年 26 巻 2 号 p. 329-355
    発行日: 2009年
    公開日: 2013/10/07
    ジャーナル フリー
    This article is concerned with what we will call determiner-headed free relatives (DHFRs), e.g. this is the what you do against the Rams. We argue, based on the raising analysis of relative clauses, that this type of relative is a variant of headed relatives whose invisible nominal head is derived from (i) decomposing wh-words into [D wh-] and [N -at], (ii) raising the latter as the nominal head, and (iii) pronouncing the original copy. This analysis attributes their headed-relative-like properties and their unique properties to their invisible nominal head. It also suggests that the raising analysis of DHFRs is preferable to the matching analysis.
Brief Article
  • JUNJI HAMAMATSU
    2009 年 26 巻 2 号 p. 356-373
    発行日: 2009年
    公開日: 2013/10/07
    ジャーナル フリー
    Prepositions do not take that-clauses as complements. They nonetheless seem to take wh-clausal complements, as in her explanation of what (else) happened. However, such an analysis is mistaken both empirically and theoretically. Instead, I present an analysis in which what seems to be a preposition taking a wh-clausal complement is actually a complementiser that is inside the CP system. More specifically, the prepositional complementiser is argued to be in Force in Rizzi’s split CP structure. It is also claimed that the complementiser of is a realisation of genitive Case. This leads to the generalisation of the Visibility Condition on Case to the clause.
  • HISASHI MORITA
    2009 年 26 巻 2 号 p. 374-393
    発行日: 2009年
    公開日: 2013/10/07
    ジャーナル フリー
    It will be argued that Agree alone is not sufficient to derive wh-questions in Japanese contra Watanabe (2006) and Munakata (2006). Specifically, covert movement or pied-pipng must follow after Agree. To validate this claim, three new pieces of evidence will be presented: scope interaction, de re/de dicto interpretations of nan-satu no NP ‘how many NPs,’ and long-distance construal of zibun-zisin ‘oneself.’ This claim, if true, supports Chomsky's (2004, 2007, 2008), in which he argues that covert movement (or pied-piping) and Agree are distinct operations. Hence, Chomsky's (2000, 2001) claim that there is no covert movement in the syntactic module should be rejected.
Notes and Discussion
Article on a Specified Topic
Review Article
  • The Minimalist Syntax of Defective Domains: Gerunds and Infinitives, by Acrisio Pires, Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today vol. 98, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 2006, xiv+188pp.
    YUKI ISHIHARA
    2009 年 26 巻 2 号 p. 497-527
    発行日: 2009年
    公開日: 2013/10/07
    ジャーナル フリー
    This review article examines Pires’s (2006) analysis of gerunds in English. The distribution of clausal gerunds with/without overt subjects as well as that of TP-defective gerunds is investigated to see how well Pires’s Case-theoretic account is empirically motivated. We also examine the properties of the subjects of gerunds in adjunct positions, since Pires, following Hornstein, argues that they involve obligatory control. It is shown that some adjuncts, especially those that precede main clauses, have properties of nonobligatory control.
  • Nihongo Hiteibun no Kozo: Kakimazebun to Hiteikoo Hyogen (The Structure of Negative Sentences in Japanese: Scrambling and Neg-sensitive Elements), by Kiyoko Kataoka, Kurosio, Tokyo, 2006, vi+282pp.
    MASAKAZU KUNO
    2009 年 26 巻 2 号 p. 528-549
    発行日: 2009年
    公開日: 2013/10/07
    ジャーナル フリー
    It is commonly believed that Negative Polarity Items (NPIs) in Japanese must be c-commanded by a sentential negation marker in the same local domain. The book under review challenges this common belief, taking up three kinds of NPIs (rokuna-, sika- and wh-mo-NPIs), and claims that the latter two must occur outside the scope of negation. The present paper reviews this claim and points out a couple of problems from the viewpoint of where negation is expressed in a sentence with an NPI. It will be shown that rokuna- and sika-NPIs, unlike wh-mo-NPIs, constitute a semantic locus of negation, hence a different grouping emerges. A solution will be suggested to reconcile this apparent contradiction.
  • On the Syntactic Composition of Manner and Motion, by Maria L. Zubizarreta and Eunjeong Oh, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2007, xii+228pp.
    KENTARO NAKATANI
    2009 年 26 巻 2 号 p. 550-572
    発行日: 2009年
    公開日: 2013/10/07
    ジャーナル フリー
    The present article critically reviews Zubizarreta and Oh (henceforth, Z&O)’s (2007) work, which proposes novel syntactic treatments of the well-known “manner-motion conflation” parameter among languages such as Korean, Germanic, and Romance (Talmy (1985)) and of a serial-verb construction parameter that explains the difference between Edo and Korean. Because there has been a long tradition of lexicalist studies on these matters (Talmy (1985), Pinker (1989), Kageyama (1993), Rappaport Hovav and Levin (1998), among others), Z&O’s work is specifically examined to see if their approach is advantageous over the lexicalist approach in terms of the predictability of the parameter setting. It is shown in the present article that Z&O’s approach is actually not as explanatory as they argue—at least it is hard to conclude that their approach has been proven better.
Obituary
feedback
Top