農業経営研究
Online ISSN : 2186-4713
Print ISSN : 0388-8541
ISSN-L : 0388-8541
49 巻, 3 号
選択された号の論文の20件中1~20を表示しています
研究論文
  • 米国アイオワ州における穀物エレベーター調査から
    内山 智裕, 西嶋 亜矢子
    2011 年 49 巻 3 号 p. 1-11
    発行日: 2011/12/25
    公開日: 2015/02/02
    ジャーナル フリー
    In the 2000s, food supply and demand in international markets changed from surplus to shortage, and international food markets experienced price fluctuations. Japan’s government set the guideline for Facilitating Overseas Investment for Food Security in 2009, which announced a policy to pursue import stabilization and diversification in order to secure a stable food supply.
    This study focuses on grain collection in the USA, especially via local grain elevators which deal directly with producers, in order to reveal the recent trends, prospects and implications for a stable food supply to Japan. Case studies were conducted in Iowa, USA, where the highest production of corn and soybeans has been recorded among the states. The survey was conducted by a series of interviews, consisting of telephone and interview surveys with 30 elevators, an additional interview survey with 5 elevators, and another interview with a Japanese trading company’s subsidiary in the USA, from July to September 2010. The main findings are as follows :
    First, the share of agricultural cooperatives in grain collection is extremely high in Iowa. The reasons are : (1) historical factors, especially their long and strong history ; (2) geographical factors, with railways being the main means of transportation ; and (3) the cooperatives’expansion strategies in recent years.
    Second, the selection of business partners by local elevators depends on their business affiliation. Subsidiaries of Grain Majors (e.g., ADM, Cargill) tend to sell their grains to parent companies. Agricultural cooperatives and independent elevators have various partners, and their main buyers are domestic, whom they can serve by using trucks and railway transportation. The elevators are seldom concerned the final destination or intended end usage of the commodity.
    Third, most of the local elevators do not utilize Identity Preserved (IP) handling to deal with non-genetically modified (non-GM) grains.
    Fourth, Japanese companies do not have much of a presence among the elevators in Iowa. However, elevators in general are positive about a tie-up with them if there is an opportunity for profit.
    From the findings above, the implications of this study are as follows :
    The relationship between agricultural cooperatives and Grain Majors is considered as a business partnership. It is presumed that the grain collection controlled by agricultural cooperatives will continue in areas like Iowa where the investment efficiency is low. In these areas, well-constructed sharing roles have been established between agricultural cooperatives and companies involved with processing or exporting businesses.
    With respect to grain flows, it was observed that corn flows in particular are becoming increasingly complicated. Corn can be shipped to domestic and overseas feed markets as well as ethanol plants. This indicates that local elevators have an increasing number of buyers they can sell to Japanese trading companies are not likely to invest or buy out the share of local elevators of agricultural cooperatives. Even if they buy out elevators to build their own collection network on their own, they will not always obtain the grains as each elevator pursues its own profit maximization with various partners. In other words, utilizing an in-house collection network by Japanese companies would not always result in expanding Japan’s grain supply.
    Considering the above-mentioned circumstances, we conclude that the pattern of grain flows, wherein agricultural cooperatives collect the grain from producers and Grain Majors process and transfer it to Japanese companies for exports, will be stable. There are limited possibilities for Japanese trading companies to establish grain collection networks on their own, which may or may not result in a more stable food supply to Japan.
  • 北陸・新潟県上越市三和区を対象に
    細山 隆夫
    2011 年 49 巻 3 号 p. 12-22
    発行日: 2011/12/25
    公開日: 2015/02/02
    ジャーナル フリー
    In this report, we clarify the situation and set making of large-scale leased farm land management in a rice field region. The study region is in Niigata Prefecture’s Joetsu City, Sanwa Ward, which is a farmland fluidizing progress region. The results are as follows.
    First, the development of large-scale leased land management is ongoing. In addition, the progress of the development of large division field maintenance accelerates farm abandonment, and this movement is strengthening further. However, village farming develops assuming that the large division field maintenance is an opportunity.
    Second, large-scale leased land management now exceeds village farming in terms of management area share. On the other hand, village farming is a current maintenance organization. Moreover, the village farming of the dysfunction exists in the inside, too.
    Third, the large-scale leased land management leads to a shift to labor saving in agriculture. The phase of the management work and the regional resource management reduce via the large division field maintenance. Also, large-scale leased land management has led to farmland, and in some villages, to farm abandonment.
  • 久保 雄生
    2011 年 49 巻 3 号 p. 23-33
    発行日: 2011/12/25
    公開日: 2015/02/02
    ジャーナル フリー
    This study was aimed at clarifying the situation of farmland ownership by absentee farmers, and the continuous use factor of farmland by means of a questionnaire survey to nonresident farmland owners. In addition, the study tried to derive the problem and counter measures used when the farmland that the absentee farmer owned land was managed by surveying the farmers.
    The main details that the farmland owner made absent was farmland succession, and clarified that most farmland which nonresident landowners had acquired through succession was managed by individual farmers. In addition, it is important to note that a main factor to encourage the use of farmland by nonresident landowners is farmland owner homecoming frequency to the region, and relationship to farm managers.
    However, it is necessary to develop mechanisms that encourage farmland management, because there might not be a successor to the farmer who manages nonresident landowner land.
    The results of the survey indicated the advantages of granting farmland management rights to farmers and re-organizing relations between absentee landowners and regional farmers.
報告論文
feedback
Top