Unified disease criteria are useful for assessing disease severity and treatment outcomes; however, at present, there are no adequate unified criteria for temporomandibular disorders. We conducted a review of articles focused on the assessment of treatment criteria for temporomandibular disorders that appeared in volumes 1 to 23 of the Journal of the Japanese Society for the Temporomandibular Joint. Examination items included the number of articles each year, outcome measures and the studies' assessment criteria and comprehensive assessment criteria.
Thirty-seven articles were extracted and 40 outcome measures were used in the articles. Of these 40 cases, pain was adopted in 36 cases, opening range in 36 cases, disability of daily living in 14 cases, and temporomandibular joint sound in 14 cases. As for pain measures, pain assessment during mandibular movement was selected in 9 cases and mandibular pain assessment during rest was selected in 4 cases. In addition, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) -based assessment criteria were adopted in 10 cases, and assessment criteria using methods other than VAS were selected in 26 cases. One report proposed that the criteria for a successful treatment outcome should be based on an improvement of all examination items while another study proposed that treatment outcomes should be based on the improvement of at least one examination item.
We found that diverse outcome measures and assessment criteria are used in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders and that, in a number of instances, the same treatment outcome was assessed differently. We hope that The Japanese Society for the Temporomandibular Joint will now go ahead and formulate assessment criteria for temporomandibular disorders.
View full abstract