Neogene Tertiary composed of Atsumi, Kamigo, Mogami and Shonai Groups are developed on the basement of pre-Tertiary granites in the Shonai basin of Yamagata, Japan. Mogami Group which is composed of Aosawa, Kusanagi, Kitamata, Tateyama, Maruyama and Kannonji Formations, has been studied from the petroleum geological viewpoints in order to examine its potentiality of oil and natural gas.
Six routes in mountaineous area of the eastern part of Shonai basin have been surveyed in detail and two hundreds of mudstones and siltstones in Mogami Group were collected. Mineral composition of these samples were analyzed by X-ray diffractometer using zinc oxides as internal standard sample. From these data, the writers settled the following five mineral assemblages. These assemblages include A
1 (montmorillonite-illite-poor chlorite-quartz-analcite and/or heulandite-calcite-dolomite zone), A
2 (poor montmorillonite-illite-poor chlorite-cristobalite-clinoptilolite-calcite-dolomite zone), A
3 (montmorillonite-illite-poor chlorite-cristobalite-clinoptilolite-calcite zone), B
1 (montmorillonite-illite-chlorite-kaolinite-cristobalite-clinoptilolite zone), and B
2 (montmorillonite-illite-poor chlorite-kaolinite-plagioclase-clinoptilolite zone). Stratigraphically, assemblage A
1 may be equivalent to Aosawa Formation; A
2 to Kusanagi and lower part of Kitamata F.; A
3 to upper part of Kitamata, Tateyama and Maruyama F.; B
1 to lower part of Kannonji F.; and B
2 to upper part of Kannonji F. (Jozenji Facies).
Significance of these mineral assemblages were discussed from the sedimentary petrological points of view. As a result, it is clear that these assemblages are quite suitable for the analysis of depositional environments, source materials and diagenesis in argillaceous rocks of Mogami Group.
The mineral assemblages in argillaceous rocks of the Mogami group at five wells drilled in the Shonai plain have been studied. Settled five mineral assemblages are somewhat different from those of mountaineous area. However, these assemblages may clear the stratigraphic problems between Aosawa and Kusanagi Formations which have been identified by lithological and paleontological data only.
View full abstract