(1) The fact, that the water temperature in the deep layer of lake is governed by its surface area or fetch size, had been discovered by the late Dr. S. Yoshimura. But he did not relate the heat budget of lakes to their scales. In this report, several relations between the thermal peoperty of lakes and their scales are discussed.
(2) The depth of thermocline (D) or surface layer (De) (epilimnion) of lake differs greatly accord-ing to the scale of lake in summer. Actual values of D and De are decided from the vertical temperature profiles following Lund's method. The relations between D or De values and the fetch size of lakes, are presented in Fig. 1, which shows 1/3 power laws. Concerning several Japanese lakes, the empirical relationship D=6L_??_ is obtained from the author's data and Horiuchi's results in the summer season. In the two adjacent lake basins of Shinsei-ko Pond near Tokyo, vertical temperature profiles were measured to compare the effect of fetch size on the profiles. The results of observations are shown in Fig. 3.
(3) Annual heat budget of lake (∑Q) ie calculated by the following formula.
∑Q=C•_??_dt•dz
Because water temperature in the surface layer of lake in summer (θ
max) does not differ greatly by the seale of lake, and the same tendency is recognized in mid-winter (θ
min), so the numerical value of ∑Q is approximately represented by functional form of D.
∑Q_??_(θ
max-θ
min)D=const
1•D_??_L_??_
The relation between ∑Q values and the fetch size of lakes is shown in Pig. 4, which supports the pre-ceding considerations at least concerning Japanese lakes.
The surface water temperature is decided by terminal temperature in a shallow pond, but in a large and deep lake discrepancy between the surface temperature and the terminal temperature (θ
∞) becomes evident. This tendency is more remarkable in a large lake than in a small one.
On the other hand, heat balance consideration being introduccd to the above discussion, heat balance equation i s given by the following form;
∑Q=R
n-H-LE
where R
n represents net-radiation, H and LE show sensible and latent heat exchanges a t water surface. As there are no remarkable differences of solar and net-radiation values all over Japan from spring to autumn seasons, we can assume the following relation as an approximation.
(∑Q-R
n)_??_-const
2•D_??_L_??_ This tendency is also examined by the other calculations, using heat transfer coefficient and air-water temperature differences (Fig. 7). Numerical value of the transfer coefficient is 2×10
-4ly/sec. °C in this case.
From these considerations, it is found out that the evaporation from lake surface (F) in the spring and summer seasons in warm and cold regions decreases in proportion to the scale of lake.
(4) The thermocl.ine of lake does not appear in tropical region where annual variations of terminal temperature and heat flux are very small. In this region, the lake temperature remains almost isothermal throughout the year. Above discussions state that the terminal temperature is not the true surface tern. perature, but in this case we may take θ
∞ value as the first approximation of surface temperature. In Pig. 8 annual variation of θ
∞ values at several stations of the world are shown with the world distribu Lion of the value (Fig. 9).
View full abstract