Objective. With respect to the classification of papillary adenocarcinoma, there is a slight difference in the handling of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) between the WHO (IASLC) and the Japanese Lung Cancer Society. We therefore evaluated cases diagnosed as papillary adenocarcinoma and BAC clinicopathologically to determine which classification is appropriate.
Subjects and Methods. Among all the lung cancers resected from 1987 to 1995, the 183 cases diagnosed as papillary adenocarcinoma or BAC were included in this study. These cases were classifiedby histological findings into 3 groups, namely, specimens showing only a BAC pattern (BAC group), specimens showing a BAC pattern in the marginal region of the tumor and papillary adenocarcinoma pattern in the center of the tumor (PB group) and specimens showing only a pattern of papillary adenocarcinoma without any BAC pattern in the marginal region of the tumor (PA group). Among these 3 groups, clinical findings (age, sex, smoking history), pathological findings (p-TN factor, p-stage, vascular invasion, lymphatic invasion, cancer cell subtype) as well as ki67 antigen expression, VEGF expression, p53 abnormal protein expression by immunohistochemistry and k-ras codon 12 mutation by RFLPPCR were examined and compared.
Results. The proportion of females was significantly higher in the BAC group than in the PB+PA group (p=0.008), and significant differences in pT factor, pN factor and p-stage were found between the two groups. Pathologically, a significant difference in vascular invasion, lymphatic invasion and degree of differentiation were found. Significant differences in ki67 expression (p=0.002) and VEGF expression (p=0.029) and k-ras mutation (p=0.022) were also recognized. When the findings were compared between the PB group and PA group, a significant difference was found only in p-stage, and no significant difference in other factors was found clinically or pathologically. In comparison of the 5-year survival rate and freedom from recurrence, prognosis was significantly better in the BAC group than in the PB+PA group, but there was no difference between the PB group and PA group.
Conclusion. When we investigate cancer cell subtypes, there may be a difference between the PB group and PA group embryologically. Based on the present results, patients in the PB group and the PA group appears equivalent clinically and pathologically. The above differences, including resulted surgery, were found clinically and pathologically between the BAC group and the PB+PA group. At present, it seems reasonable from a clinical view point that a carcinoma that proliferates and replaces alveolar epithelium, but does not infiltrate interstitially, should be defined as BAC and all others as papillary adenocarcinoma.
View full abstract