Higher Brain Function Research
Online ISSN : 1880-6554
Print ISSN : 1348-4818
ISSN-L : 1348-4818
Volume 25, Issue 4
Displaying 1-3 of 3 articles from this issue
Cross-talk
Original articles
  • Hideki Ohyama
    2005 Volume 25 Issue 4 Pages 297-305
    Published: 2005
    Released on J-STAGE: March 01, 2007
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Piracetam is a nootropic agent (noos=mind; tropein=towards) that improves cognitive functions such as learning and memory. Piracetam is well known for its effectiveness in improving speech in aphasic patients in Europe and the United States, but it is not available in Japan. Early double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in patients suffering acute stroke showed improvement in aphasia, but there has been no suggestion of clinical improvement in chronic aphasic patients to whom it is administered more than 3 years after onset of stroke. This pilot study in post-stroke patients has shown that piracetam, when administered to patients with chronic aphasia who were not receiving intensive language treatment, improved speech in those patients. The mode of action of piracetam is not well understood. Piracetam acts at the level of the cell membrane to which it binds. The findings of this study suggest that piracetam may also exert its effects not only at the damaged telen-cephalon but also at the telencephalon on the opposite side by activating neuro-transmission.
    Download PDF (424K)
  • Nobuyuki Sunahara, Masako Notoya
    2005 Volume 25 Issue 4 Pages 306-313
    Published: 2005
    Released on J-STAGE: March 01, 2007
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    In 36 patients with left unilateral spatial neglect due to right hemispheric damage, a sound lateralization test was conducted as an auditory task, using a Rhion audiometer AA-75. The test results were analyzed in relation to the score calculated from the results of a Behavioural inattention test (a visual task). In the sound lateralization test, the left/right ratio of the inter-aural time difference discrimination threshold was determined, and the percent increase was calculated in the left inter-aural time difference discrimination threshold relative to that on the right. As a result, no significant correlation existed between the sum scores of a Behavioural inattention test (usual tasks and/or behavioural tasks) and sound lateralization test scores in all the unilateral spatial neglect patients. And the left/right ratio of the inter-aural time difference discrimination threshold did not correlate significantly with the score calculated from any subtests of the Behavioural inattention test. Accordingly, we found that the severity of auditory tasks was not always consistent with that of visual tasks in unilateral spatial neglect cases. This suggests that patients with severe unilateral neglect sometimes show only mild abnormalities in auditory tasks. In such cases, the utilization of auditory stimuli in treatment can compensate for unilateral neglect symptoms.
    Download PDF (408K)
feedback
Top