We conducted a validation study examining the clock drawing test (CDT) utilizing a video teleconference system (remote-CDT) compared to in-person testing. We also analyzed the effect of age-related hearing loss, and examined the acceptability of remote-CDT by 5-point Likert scale. A total of 77 subjects (normal elderly controls[NC], 38;mild cognitive impairment[MCI], 15;patients with Alzheimerʼs disease[AD], 24) participated in the study. Each participant went through CDT twice, i.e. remote-CDT and in-person CDT in random order. Based on all subjects, the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the two testing sessions was ≥ 0.83. When analyzing each diagnosis group separately, ICCs were ≥ 0.67 for the NC group, ≥ 0.59 for the MCI group, and ≥ 0.84 for the AD group, respectively showing sufficient concordance. Moreover, ICCs were ≥ 0.81 for both subgroups that conducted in-person or remote-CDT first, indicating no impact on the scores by testing order. Among the subjects with suspected hearing impairment, ICC was ≥ 0.91, which indicated a high level of concordance. Based on a questionnaire, 70% of the subjects felt slight fear and nervousness during the test, and 70% of the subjects felt that the remote-CDT was as easy to answer or even easier to answer compared to in-person testing;these figures indicate that remote-CDT was not rejected by the participants.
View full abstract