Every day, we see and hear the words “aging,” “aging population,” and “aging society”. These words areoften conveyed in a negative impression. Although everyone is getting old and aging, it has been difficult toconfront ourselves aging with own problems. Humans have not achieved eternal youth but longevity withaging. Medical advances will not stop and human life expectancy will continue to increase further. Therefore,for humans, the problems and challenges of aging will never be resolved. In such a society, while individual’saging is various, it is also necessary to consider the dignified life that all people should have. This paperexamines “life” and “death” with dignity in “aging” from various aspects of aging.In “Old age (La Vieillesse)” by Beauvoir, there is a marvelous collection of words of lamentation andsorrow that can be seen as a diverse definition of “aging” from poets, writers, novelists, politicians, militarypersonnel, and others in different positions and environments. Although there is a gap in time, I see positiveattitudes toward “aging” today in Takaaki Yoshimoto, Tomio Tada, and my own mother. What they all have incommon is an independent and self-selective attitude.As the aging society accelerates, there is much talk about “death with dignity,” but little talk about “life withdignity”. The law emphasizes that those in need of care should “maintain their dignity and lead independentdaily lives along with their abilities. Although there are various definitions, “independence” is considered tomean “making decisions” based on “one’s own will,” which is the core of dignity. In order to support “lifewith dignity,” it is important to sustain the act of self-selection (choice), i.e., not to reduce the options that arediminishing with “aging” and to compensate for the limited options.
抄録全体を表示