In this paper, we investigate the practical effectiveness of unimodal EEG and multimodal EMG–IMU sensing for upper-limb movement intention detection in assistive exoskeleton control. Accurate and low-latency intention decoding is essential for post-stroke rehabilitation; however, many prior studies conflate sensing modality, model architecture, and evaluation protocol, limiting fair comparison and practical interpretation. To isolate the effect of sensing configuration, we adopt a controlled top-down evaluation in which the learning algorithm, feature extraction framework, and hyperparameters are fixed, and only the biosignal modality is varied. The study follows the experimental framework defined in the MUMIDC challenge, implementing both subject-wise and cross-subject evaluation settings using reproducible stratified splits. Using the MUMID dataset, we formulate a seven-class classification task covering functional upper-limb movement primitives. A unified preprocessing and feature extraction pipeline is applied to EEG, EMG, and IMU signals, followed by classification using a fixed multi-class XGBoost model. Two sensing configurations are evaluated: EEG-only and early-fusion EMG+IMU. Performance is assessed using Accuracy and macro-averaged F1-score. Results show that EMG+IMU consistently outperforms EEG-only across both evaluation settings. In subject-wise validation, EMG+IMU achieves 89.80\% Accuracy and 89.77\% Macro-F1, compared to approximately 50\% for EEG-only, with substantially lower inter-subject variability. Under cross-subject evaluation, EMG+IMU exhibits only minor degradation, whereas EEG-only declines markedly. These findings highlight a clear trade-off between sensing complexity and robustness for practical exoskeleton control.
\\Keywords: Upper-limb rehabilitation, exoskeleton control, movement intention detection, EEG, EMG, IMU, multimodal fusion, machine learning, XGBoost.
抄録全体を表示