In Japan, there are two main issues of health economics. The first is many patients want to go to big hospitals to take a consultation. Many patients believe big hospitals have good doctors, co-medicals, instrument and care, and so, they tend to choose big hospitals if they have a light illness like a cold. The second issues of health economics in Japan is medical service delivery system and medical invenstment. In Japan, high functioning hospitals still supply longterm care after introducing long-term care insurance and small hospitals get some expensive instrument like a liniac which is a radi-instrument against cancer. In other words, Patient's rushing into big hospitals and unspecialized medical service supply system are Japanese health field issues.
Since 1992, MHLW has changed this situation. In 1992, MHLW appoints some hospitals as high functioning hospital by 4 conditions which include 30%introduction rate and 500 beds more etc. and patient must get a refer paper to take consultation at high functioning hospitals without additional cost. In 1996, if patients directly go to hospital 200 beds over, they must pay additional fee. Now, patients seldom go to big hospitals without refer paper, which we con firm by our data and some hospitals take a motive to reduce average in-patient days less than 14 days for getting more consultation fee from 2000.
In this paper, we analyze patient behavior and extent of hospital specialization using MHLW micro data. As a result of MHLW actions from 1992, most of patients (about 96% patient in 2000) use clinic or small hospital as a house doctor and take refer paper before going to big hospitals. However, immature of longterm care facilities and imperfection of medical fee system make some Japanese, hospital unspecialized as ever.
View full abstract