In this article, I first made comparisons between social insurance system and social assistance system in long-term care and medical care for the elderly. Second,
I examined the problems of the proposal which notes that long-term care and medical care for the elderly shall be provided through the social assistance system. I examined theoretically and practically the merits and demerits of the social insurance system and the social assistance system, using seventeen independent standards of analysis. In adaptability to the economic system, universality and entitlement of benefits, level of benefits, financing, easy access to services and selection of services, the social insurance system is superior both theoretically and practically. However, with respect to expenditure control, easy collection of taxes and cheap management cost the social assistance system is superior both theoretically and practically. It depends on how they are constructed on which is superior between social insurance contributions and taxes as financial resources, and between social insurance system and social assistance system in service delivery. In conclusion, the social insurance system is superior as a whole. This is why social insurance system plays a major part in the Japanese social security schemes.
Second, it has been insisted that long-term care and medical care insurance is not applicable to the elderly, since the risks are too high. In contrast, I clearly emphasize the concept of the insurance principle-pooling of risks-and that this is applicable even to the elderly in the social insurance system. I also pointed out that long-term care and medical care for the elderly through the social assistance system will make their financing difficult and it is anticipated that a limitation of benefits by income or assets shall be introduced and that benefit levels shall be decreased accordingly.
View full abstract