The second stage graphitization of blackheart malleable iron is currently performed by slow cooling through a temperature range 760°C to 650°C, including the critical temperature range of the iron, or holding it at subcritical temperatures near 700°C. Few reports have, however, been published on the mechanism of the second stage graphitization. To investigate it, the authors have studied the graphitization phenomena in proeutectoid, critical and subcritical temperature range. For this, a differential transformer type dilatometer which is available for differential thermal analysis was used simultaneously to obtain various cooling curves of temperature, length and heat occurrence of the specimen. The melt was made by duplex melting of cupola-Hēroult arc furnace and cast into a green sand mold. After both first and second stage graphitization had been completed in a continuous annealing furnace, the specimen was reheated up to 900°C, held for two hours and subsequently cooled rapidly in atmosphere. For obtaining cooling curve, the specimen having pearlitic matrix was reheated to 900°C and then slowly cooled to a holding temperature of proeutectoid, critical or subcritical range. Rapid cooling was made by helium gas blowing at the temperature at which the iron showed a definite discontinuity or heat occurrence. The microstructure of specimen thus quenched showed that the matrix which was austenitic before cooling was completely changed to extremely fine pearlite, whilst the pearlitic isle which was in advance produced by Ar
1 transformation had a coarse lamellar structure. Experimental results are summarized as follows: 1) Among three phases existing in the temperature range between 900°C and 760°C, ferrite was separated at grain boundries directly from austenite by holding the iron in the proeutectoid temperature range below 900°C. The longer the holding time, the more the amount of ferrite separated. Howeyer, it did not take a long time before an equilibrium was established and further separation ot ferrite ceased to take place. 2) In the temperature range between 760°C and 730°C ferrite deposited around temper carbon nodule, and a perfect ferritization occurred. The rate of ferrite deposition depended upon the holding temperature in such a way that the lower the holding temperature, the higher the rate of the ferrite deposision. It is assumed that the deposition of ferrite around temper carbon nodule occurred directly from austenite because of a lack of carbon content in it which was caused by direct graphitization onto existing carbon nodule. 3) In the temperature range just below 730°C austenite was rapidly transformed to pearlite. It is rather difficult for the pearlite to decompose at said temperatures. In this case, the deposition of pearlite can be clearly detected according to the occurrence of latent heat due to transformation. It was further well known that there was a comparatively large difference in heat occurrence detected on differential heat curve between direct graphitization and pearlite formation. 4) As a result of experiment, it may be concluded that the time of the second stage graphitization can be minimized by holding the iron at proper temperatures in the critical range. It is, however, hard in foundry practice to maintain castings in such a narrow range of temperature. As compared wih this, in the authors' laboratory the second stage graphitization could be performed by an extremely short time holding, less than one hour, as was shown on the cooling curve of heat occurrence through Ar
1 transformation.
抄録全体を表示