As a new estimate, we analyzed a mismatch between public evaluation and planning decisions.In this paper, we call this mismatch “the failure of spatial planning for sustainable development”. This paper will compare two adjoining municipalities (
α town and
β city) that employed different settlement relocation processes after the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami (March 11, 2011).
α town selected seven new candidate relocation sites from non surplus land of pre-existing city plan by a citizen participation and holistic land selection process.On the other hand,
β city selected unused city planning sites (pre-existing), which were already planned before the 2011 disaster. The reconstruction process of
α town involved citizen and public co-determination, whereas
β city only determined a quick-fix solution without renewed planning. Unfortunately, most disaster reconstruction efforts in Tohoku appear similar to
β city. With a field survey on 16 relocation sites in 2012, we asked 80 university students to evaluate the environments of the two municipalities' relocation sites by Semantic Differential Method. As a result,
α town’s relocation sites, which are determined with citizen and public codetermination, are higher valued that of
β city. Then, by overlay, analyzing the accessibility of the relocation sites with a new transportation network, we found that the accessibility of relocation sites in
α town is better. Our result suggests that planning processes with low administrative agency and public participation, tend to be more successful in producing an attractive redevelopment plan.
抄録全体を表示