This paper reviews earlier studies that examine how anthropologists have understood
the concepts of poverty. It reveals the focus and objectives of the anthropological
studies on poverty. The major anthropological studies of poverty have primarily
focused on economic anthropology, ecological anthropology, and social exclusion and
inclusion, including Oscar Lewis’s famous “Culture of Poverty” (1966), and the studies
that followed. Most recent studies are founded on constructionism, though some
studies use a development-as-discourse approach.
In this thesis, I present a framework of the categorization of poor people. Benedict
Anderson’s 1983 book Imagined Communities and the theory of ethnos are the most
popular studies based on the theory of categorization. Not only these studies, but
issues of caste and indigenous peoples, are analyzed using the theory of categorization.
Arjun Appadurai’s studies are based on the theory of categorization, and present an
analysis of globalization. In these studies, governments or suzerains categorize people
forcefully; however, sometimes people deny that categorization and insist on another
category. Sometimes people use these categories strategically. These categories are
not static and objective, but dynamic and subjective. Categories often change, and are
different in each viewpoint.
Studies using this approach describe the drastic situation of categorized people.
If people are categorized as “poor people” by development agencies, this approach
attempts to describe the reaction of people who are thus categorized. Depending on
the situation and social context, the categorized people may become “poor people”
strategically or may deny this category. Or categorized people may change their
attitude. Categorized people’s viewpoints and reaction are not always same. They may
react individually. The significance of this study is that it proposes a framework for the
categorization of poor people.
View full abstract