This study explores learning behaviors in massive open online courses (MOOCs) with different learning-focus tendencies using Reigeluth’s instructional framework as an analytical lens rather than a strict categorization tool. Data from five MOOCs, ranging from interdisciplinary/problem-oriented to domain-specific/topic-oriented, were analyzed using learning logs from all users and registered (paid) learners. Learner behaviors were examined in terms of access to learning materials, learning duration, and final grades, and effect-size estimates (η2) were incorporated to assess the magnitude of group differences. The findings showed that graded items were consistently accessed more frequently than other materials across all the courses. Learning duration, not the focus of learning, emerged as the strongest predictor of performance; learners with longer learning durations tended to achieve higher grades in three of the five courses and generally followed the preset sequence of graded tasks, whereas learners with shorter durations often completed tasks out of order. These results highlight stable behavioral patterns across diverse course types and suggest that learning pace and sequential engagement influence outcomes more strongly than course-level design orientation does. This study provides empirical insights into the MOOC design and learner-support strategies.
View full abstract