In the area of the medical health care, doctors have many various legal and ethical obligations to help and care for patients, to inform patients of their diseases, to keep the confidence of patients and to report infectious diseases designated by law etc. Therefore doctors face often a conflict of obligations, in which they can not carry out any one of their obligations in a specific situation without the breach of one or more other obligations. In the case of the conflict of obligations, the obligation of comparatively higher value ought to be fulfilled. But in the case of the conflict between obligations0, which are of equal value, cases ought to be classified. In the case of the conflict between obligations of active conduct, which are of equal value, and in the case of the conflict between obligations of omission, which are of equal value, one or other obligations of active conduct or one or other obligations of omission ought to be fulfilled. But in the case of the conflict between obligation of active conduct and omission, which are of equal value, the obligation of omission ought to be fulfilled. For example in the case of the conflict between obligation of active conduct to save the life of one person and obligation of omission not to kill an other person, the obligation of omission not to kill an other person ought to be fulfilled. Therefore there is no obligation to save the life of a person by killing an other person. For the evaluation of the behaviour under the conflict of obligations, there is a need to evaluate, how the obligation was fulfilled, in addition to a comparison of the obligations. To justify a medical operation, there needs firstly to be the informed consent of patients, and secondly the necessity, adequacy, and the highest mildness for the objective of the medical treatment.
View full abstract