The Pantograph Method was introduced into dental surgery for the first time in 1929 by Dr. B. B. McCollum, the father of gnathology.
Until nowadays we have been applying this method to the dental clinic as the technics of catching the mandibular movement more correctly in combination with the Fully Adjustable Articulator, which was devised later.
The schools which deny the Pantograph Method say that the mandible doesn't function on the bordermovement-path. Some clinicians doubt transferring the value, measured at the time the vertical dimension is risen, to the articulator. But it is known widely that the Pantograph Method has many advantages which no other methods of recording mandibular movement have.
Recently, with the progress of electronic engineering, many electric apparatuses have been under development for the measurement of the mandibular movement. So the Pantograph Method seems to want improving.
But now that we have seen the appearance of the TMJ Simplex Mandibular Movement Indicator, a simplified form of Pantograph Instrument, Denar's Mini Recorder and others, we can't discard the technics of the Pantograph Method.
So far, the Pantograph Method has been apt to be regarded as the technics of catching the stromaborder. This, however, is nothing but a misunderstanding.
The author found that the Pantograph-survey-line changes when we use this gnathology method which, by using the mutually protected occlusion, can centralize the patient's chewing cycle through changing his chewing cycle.
The author will give his opinion on this matter and the interrelation of the form of the central bearing plate and the incisal path.
View full abstract