Indications for pulomonary resection are currently being studied with emphasis on the postoperative quality of life. If the postoperative exercise capacity can be quantified by an objective method, the changes can be studied in detail, and it will be very useful for the predction of the degree of postoperative recovery. This objective method should also be an effective index of the rehabilitation of patients following pulmonary resection. In the present study, the authors attempted to determine whether expired gas analysis together with exercise testing can predict accurately exercise capacity in daily life following pulmonary resection.
The subjects were 22 patients who underwent curative surgery for lung cancer between November 1989 and October 1991 and who were examined with exercise tests and expired gas analysis after it had been confirmed by postoperative clinical examinations that they had no relapse. The measurements were performed 27 to 99 days postoperatively (average, 53.4±18.8 days). Energy Measurement System 2900 was used for the expired gas analysis, and a bicycle ergometer was used for the exercise test. The load was started at 30 Watts and increased by 10 Watts every 2 minutes up to 60 Watts, then by 20 Watts every 2 minutes. A Borg rating of more than 17 of the perceived exertion scale was used as a landmark for the load. The expired gas analysis was performed every 20 seconds, the anaerobic threshold (AT) and maximum oxygen consumption (VO
2max) were determined, and AT/m
2 and VO
2max/m
2 were calculated as indices by dividing the above values by the body surface area to minimize errors due to individual differences. AT was calculated by the V-slope method, and the maximum value was taken as VO
2 max. Prior to the postoperative measurements, all subjects were interviewed, and they were divided into group A and group B. Patients with no change or only a slight reduction in exercise capacity but no difficulty with daily activities after surgery were placed in group A, while those with definite reduction in exercise capacity and any difficulty with daily activities were placed in group B. The measured data were compared in the two groups. The postoperative interviews concentrated on items related to exercise capacity and any difficulties with daily activities. Group A included 12 patients, eight males and four females with a median age of 61.3±8.4 years, and in group B there were 15 patients, 10 males and five females with a median age of 67.0±8.1 years. Statistical analysis was performed with Studen's t test : a difference of p < 0.05 was considered significant. All values were expressed as mean±standard deviation.
AT was 539 100 ml/min in group A and 405±79 ml/min in group B-a significant difference (p<0.001). AT/m
2 was 358±29 ml/min/m
2 in group A and 277±52 ml/min/m
2 in group B-also a significant difference (p<0.001). The p-values were the same for AT and AT/m
2, but AT/m
2 showed a smaller standard deviation. VO
2max was 883±242 ml/min in group A and 651±125 ml/min in Group B-a significant difference (p<0.01). VO
2max was 586±145 ml/ min/m
2 in group A and 446±77 ml/min/m
2 in group B-also a significant difference (p<0.01).The p-values were the same for VO
2 max and VO
2 max/m
2, but the standard deviation for VO
2 max/m
2, was smaller.
Exercise tests and expired gas analysis were performed as objective indices to quantify exercise capacity following pulmonary resection. AT/m
2 appeared to be a useful index in comparatively early postoperative evaluations.
View full abstract