In this paper, regional policy is defined as a policy for solving inter-regional problems, rather than intra-regional problems. Regional policy is thus considered to aim at reducing regional unbalances. This paper examines the changing status and character of regional policy in Canada after World War II. In the third section, general trend of regional policy in the country was outlined. Canada's regional policy entered its preparatory period in the late 1950s,when regional problems began to be recognized, and the Federal Government introduced some programs in the beginning of the l960s. Then, regional policy was steadily reinforced during the Pearson and Trudeau Administrations, and was at its peak around 1970. Mainly because of the first oil crisis in 1974, however, the Trudeau Administration changed the existing system and developed decentralized way of policy-making: after this change, the policy certainly maintained a high status. The recession in the early 1980's, however, led to a great retreat of the policy, although the Liberal Party was the ruling party at the time. Since the Mulroney Administration of the Progressive Conservative Party, characterized by the ideology of new conservatism, appeared in 1984, regional policy has been resigned to a low status. In the fourth section, special attention was paid to the DREE (Departmentof Regional Economic Expansion) Era, l969〜1981, when regional policy gained most high status in the postwar period. It was due to the conditions such as good performance of Canadian economy, the Liberal Party as ruling party then and Trudeau's attitude of regarding national unity as important. The policy had fundamentally different features between the early years (l969〜l973) and the later years (1974〜1981). While the policy focussed on decreasing regional disparities in the former period, it was primarily concerned with development of provinces, as suggested by introduction of the joint measure by the Federal and Provincial Governments in the later period. In the concluding section, it is demonstrated that the rise and fall of regional policy have, to a great extent, been determined by the economic performance of the country: the status of the policy is relatively high in the period of good economic performance. It is also noted that political condition which party came to power and socio-cultural dimension such as the movement of Quebec's separatism did affect the priority of the policy. Moreover, considering that the regional policy has only played a marginal role in the overall context of the country's policy and that its long-run perspective was missing, it is permissive to conclude that the regional policy to aim at reducing regional disparities have had no sufficient institutional framework.
View full abstract