法政論叢

表紙

原稿種別: 表紙
1985 年 21 巻 p. Cover1-
発行日: 1985/05/20
公開日: 2017/11/01

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.20816/jalps.21.0_Cover1

ジャーナルフリー

PDF形式でダウンロード (25K)
目次

原稿種別: 表紙
1985 年 21 巻 p. Cover2-
発行日: 1985/05/20
公開日: 2017/11/01

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.20816/jalps.21.0_Cover2

ジャーナルフリー

PDF形式でダウンロード (25K)
[OTHERS]

原稿種別: 付録等
1985 年 21 巻 p. App1-
発行日: 1985/05/20
公開日: 2017/11/01

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.20816/jalps.21.0_App1

ジャーナルフリー

PDF形式でダウンロード (67K)
新国籍法について

相川貴文

原稿種別: 本文
1985 年 21 巻 p. 1-12
発行日: 1985/05/20
公開日: 2017/11/01

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.20816/jalps.21.0_1

ジャーナルフリー

抄録を表示する抄録を非表示にする

The Diet passed the law bill to revise the Nationality Law on the 18th, May, 1984. Under the revised Nationality Law, a child born to a Japanese mother and a foreign father can get Japanese nationality. In the past Japanese nationality was in principle limited to those fathered by Japanese men, which was suspected to be unconstitutional. Japan signed the United Nations' convention on abolition of discrimination against women in 1980. So the revision of the Nationality Law will open the way for Japan to ratify the convention. Since the amendments would very likely cause an increase in the number of people with dual nationalities, they are obligated to choose the nationality which they prefer before they reach the age of 22. The new Nationality Law also carries provisions that males and females are equal in the conditions of naturalization. Both non-Japanese men married to Japanese women and non-Japanese women married to Japanese men may be allowed to obtain Japanese nationality on the same conditions.

抄録全体を表示

PDF形式でダウンロード (823K)
衆議院議員の定数是正の基準と定数是正私案

大宮武郎

原稿種別: 本文
1985 年 21 巻 p. 13-38
発行日: 1985/05/20
公開日: 2017/11/01

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.20816/jalps.21.0_13

ジャーナルフリー

抄録を表示する抄録を非表示にする

1. Japan federation of bar associations' enquete and fault of the leading theory. 2. Comparative study of main theories. 3. Author's theory in the middle electoral district. 4. Author's private reform-plan for the fixed members. 5. Difference between author's and New Liberal Club's plan.

抄録全体を表示

PDF形式でダウンロード (1676K)
平民苗字必称令 : 国民皆姓

井戸田博史

原稿種別: 本文
1985 年 21 巻 p. 39-48
発行日: 1985/05/20
公開日: 2017/11/01

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.20816/jalps.21.0_39

ジャーナルフリー

抄録を表示する抄録を非表示にする

The present paper is an extract from my presentation "The Name Policy in the early Meiji Era" given at the conference of the Japan Association of Legal and Political Sciences in May, 1984. Before Meiji, a person's surname indicated his lineage and his privileged status. Only the people in the privileged classes-the samurai class and above-were permitted to have their family names. In the Meiji Era, however, the surname came to be regarded as the name of "Ie(家)" after many complicated processes, and it was ordered that all Japanese should have their surnames. After the Second World War, "Ie(家)" was abolished, and as the result, today's surname has come to be considered to be the name of the individual. Actually, however, the surname is not necessarily understood as the name of the individual in our feelings and customs, and consequently, it brings forward many problems. Therefore, the problems involved in the surname are old but new. Our surnames today are based on the name policy adopted in the early Meiji Era. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the nature of the name policy adopted in that period, because it will be an important clue to approach the complicated problems involved in the present-day surname. This paper contains the following items: 1. Introduction 2. The way to "the Ordinance to compel the Commoner to have their Surnames" (1) The denial of the "privileged surname" given by the former Tokugawa shogunate (2) "The Ordinance to Permit the Commoner to have thier Surnames" 3. The Ordinance to Compel the Commoner to have their Surnames 4. Prospects

抄録全体を表示

PDF形式でダウンロード (776K)
「隣人訴訟」と日本人の法意識

井戸田博史

原稿種別: 本文
1985 年 21 巻 p. 49-63
発行日: 1985/05/20
公開日: 2017/11/01

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.20816/jalps.21.0_49

ジャーナルフリー

抄録を表示する抄録を非表示にする

A symposium, with the theme of "the lawsuit against the neighbor, "was held at the conference of the Japan Association of Legal and Political Sciences in November, 1984. The present paper is an extract from my presentation at that symposium from the viewpoint of legal history and the traditional legal consciousness of the Japanese. "The lawsuit against the neighbor"concerns a judgement handed down by the Tsu(津) District Court in February, 1983 in regard to an accident in which an infant was drowned in Suzuka City, Mie Prefecture in August, 1977. The couple living next door to the plaintiffs in this case acceded, with good will and without charge, to take care of the plaintiffs' child while the mother went shoopping. While the mother was absent, however, the child was drowned. The plaintiffs brought suit against the neighbor, and in the end at least partially won the suit. Following the decision, however, the plaintiffs received numerous derogatory and nasty telephone calls and letters from all over the country. Because of this pressure, the plaintiffs felt compelled to drop the case. Such a case reminds us of the traditional legal consciousness;that is, their dislikes of lawsuits. In this article, the author systematizes the theories concerning the deep-seated Japanese lagal consciousness namely, the dislike of lawsuits-introduces public reactions to this case, and studies the traditional legal consciousness of the Japanese as illustrated in this "lawsuit against the neighbor. This paper contains the following items:1. Introduction 2. "The lawsuit against the neighbor"and public reactions to it 3. Legal consciousness of the Japanese-the dislike of lawsuits 4. "The lawsuit against the neighbor"and the dislike of lawsuits 5. Prospects

抄録全体を表示

PDF形式でダウンロード (1118K)
公務員の不法行為

貝田守

原稿種別: 本文
1985 年 21 巻 p. 64-69
発行日: 1985/05/20
公開日: 2017/11/01

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.20816/jalps.21.0_64

ジャーナルフリー

抄録を表示する抄録を非表示にする

Es gibt die vorschrift der unerlaubten Handlangen von Beamten im Gesetz der Staatsersatzhaftung. In §1 des Gesetz der Staatsersatzhandlung handelt es sich besonders um "das Ausuben des Staatsrecht" und "inbezug auf der Ausubungen das Amt". Richtig moge man die Scheintheorie nennen, ist sie herrschende Meinung. Das ist wichtiger uber Auffassung von "in bezug auf der Ausubungen das Amt", dass muss die mit Rucksicht auf die Rechtswidrigkeiten tun, als die weiten Auffassung. Sonstige Probleme sind in diesen Abhandlung lassen.

抄録全体を表示

PDF形式でダウンロード (448K)
医療事故をめぐる若干の問題 : 医師の説明義務と関連して

門脇稔

原稿種別: 本文
1985 年 21 巻 p. 70-83
発行日: 1985/05/20
公開日: 2017/11/01

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.20816/jalps.21.0_70

ジャーナルフリー

抄録を表示する抄録を非表示にする

I. Medical contract and fiduciary relationship Consent of medical contract is as follows:a individual generally places its means in a doctor's hands in order that he gets a doctor to cure his mental or physical disease. It presupposes that there is fiduciary relationship among them. A doctor, therefore, gives thoroughly explanation to patient, and then he needs to cure the patient with the consent of him. II. A view of theory There are many theories on a doctor's explanation and patient's informed consent. In this study, however, owing to limited space, I specially examined the theory of Koichi Bai. III. Change in doctor's consciousness Development of a theory should not be merely abstract logic, but its results should make much for the national medical policy. Therefore, we require practical study. I pursued this end by analyzing of questionnaire on medical practitioner and examined the real state of medical practice. IV. The moot points of questionnaire The results of questionnaire suggest remarkable aspect as follows:(1)the importance of history(2)the number of patients(3)interest in medical trouble(4)explanation to patients(5)medical treatment to incompetent person(6)record of clinical chart V. For ideal medical treatment, fiduciary relationship between doctor and patient should be maintained. On that account, we need to amand the medical practitioner law and the dental medical practitioner law now in use, and to make doctor's explanation legal duty.

抄録全体を表示

PDF形式でダウンロード (828K)
弁護人の任務における課題

山本晶樹

原稿種別: 本文
1985 年 21 巻 p. 84-94
発行日: 1985/05/20
公開日: 2017/11/01

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.20816/jalps.21.0_84

ジャーナルフリー

抄録を表示する抄録を非表示にする

The Japanese legal system in the criminal defensive field was advanced as well as or more than American legal system after the world war II. However, from the 1960's, the effort to cover the gap between the legal guarantee and the actual application in this field has been made, the separate and advances were resulted, and they continue at present among the two nations. The point of this thesis is the study on the gap and the cause between Japanese and American thoughts about the part of the defender, taking the way to deal with the disorder in the court as a example of the differences between the two nations. The construction of this thesis is as follows:1. Introduction 2. The Part of the Defender 3. How To Deal With The Disorder in The Court 4. Subject

抄録全体を表示

PDF形式でダウンロード (793K)
就業時間中のリボン闘争の正当性

樫原義比古

原稿種別: 本文
1985 年 21 巻 p. 95-102
発行日: 1985/05/20
公開日: 2017/11/01

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.20816/jalps.21.0_95

ジャーナルフリー

抄録を表示する抄録を非表示にする

In Japanese labour-management relation union members often take a very skillful tactics wearing a ribbon on their clothes under the direction of the union during working time to attain effectively their aims. Of course, employer has and will retain the right and power to manage the plant and direct the working forces on company time, therefore, in a general sense the union activity on the job seems to be inconsistent with obligation to work earnestly. If so, is employer justified disciplining union member for union activity on the job or should employer tolerate the minor infringements which do no real harm to bussiness or production activities? It is not self-evident whether the legal protection is enjoyed in case where the member of trade union engages in the activities of the union on company time without employer's consent. Though there are many points that need clarification, I have examined this thesis. This paper contains the following items:1. Introduction 2. Cases and the theory of this thesis 3. Prospect

抄録全体を表示

PDF形式でダウンロード (654K)
アメリカ大統領の「拒否権」制の今日的意義

間宮庄平

原稿種別: 本文
1985 年 21 巻 p. 103-117
発行日: 1985/05/20
公開日: 2017/11/01

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.20816/jalps.21.0_103

ジャーナルフリー

抄録を表示する抄録を非表示にする

Students of American government have paid a great deal of attention to the Presidential power, especially in recent years. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the relation between the congress and presidential veto power. The formal presidential veto power provides only the constitution of the United States of America(Article. 1, 7section(2), (3)). This is certainly true of one of the principal formal links between the presidential veto power and congress. The presidential veto power is frequently asserted to be of crucial importance to the presidential governability and leadership in legislative process in congress. The framers of the constitution intended the presidential veto power to be used as a defense against the encroachment of presidential powers by the congress. The crucial point of this paper was that the presidential veto power was a versatile weapon for the presidential leadership, policymaking and governability.

抄録全体を表示

PDF形式でダウンロード (1115K)
[CATALOG]

原稿種別: 文献目録等
1985 年 21 巻 p. A12-A1
発行日: 1985/05/20
公開日: 2017/11/01

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.20816/jalps.21.0_A12

ジャーナルフリー

PDF形式でダウンロード (300K)
[OTHERS]

原稿種別: 付録等
1985 年 21 巻 p. App2-
発行日: 1985/05/20
公開日: 2017/11/01

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.20816/jalps.21.0_App2

ジャーナルフリー

PDF形式でダウンロード (27K)
裏表紙

原稿種別: 表紙
1985 年 21 巻 p. Cover3-
発行日: 1985/05/20
公開日: 2017/11/01

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.20816/jalps.21.0_Cover3

ジャーナルフリー

PDF形式でダウンロード (35K)
CONTENTS

原稿種別: 表紙
1985 年 21 巻 p. Cover4-
発行日: 1985/05/20
公開日: 2017/11/01

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.20816/jalps.21.0_Cover4

ジャーナルフリー

PDF形式でダウンロード (35K)

J-STAGEへの登録はこちら（無料）