Since Tuchman’s (1978) analysis of newsroom routines, related case studies have been accumulating in the United States for over 40 years. Many studies have employed ethnographic methods to examine how news workers gatekeep news. In recent years, Mari (2016) has attempted to describe a social history of the newsroom, furthering its contextual understanding.
This research tried to describe the social history of the "photographers" who belonged to major Japanese newspaper companies after World War II, using the Shinbunkenkyu as the source material and extracts the dominant factors and contexts in postwar Japan.
The following are the extracted factors and contexts.
1) The first factor is education: Higher education influenced the rise of the photographers’ status in Japanese newsrooms. Professional education in photography had a short-lived impact and was replaced by higher education as general education. In the United States, it was professional education in higher education that elevated the status of photographers, contrary to Japan’s case.
2) The second factor is technological advancements: In Japan in the 1990s, the spread of electronic cameras, the ease of sending photos electronically, and the systematization of newsrooms limited the rise of the photographers’ status in newsrooms. Whereas in the United States, this elevated their status. The difference between Japan and the United States arose from the combination of other technologies.
3) The third factor is labor unions: Japanese labor unions aimed for uniform treatment in newsrooms, and the unintended consequence was curbing the differentiation of news workers. In the United States, where weekly wages were set for each type of job, labor unions promoted the differentiation of news workers.
4) The fourth factor is specific coverage area and news sources: The lack of specific coverages areas and news sources has had significantly impacted their status in newsrooms.
抄録全体を表示