This research seeks to analyze the historical background of the radioactive waste policy formation in Finland based on a comparison with Germany. Within Högselius (2009)’s five broad explanatory factors which are identified in relation to the observed differences in spent nuclear fuel (SNF) policy outcomes around the world, military ambitions and non-proliferation, political culture and civil society, and energy policy are discussed in this research note. Both countries do not have own nuclear weapons, but they were in the different context of the Cold War. Some German officials thought at some points that they needed nuclear weapons. Besides, these officials were argued extensively about the nuclear nonproliferation treaty; until 1989, they pursued reprocessing that could make nuclear armament possible. In Finland, the Nordic Nuclear Weapons Free Zone Agreement Initiative was proposed, and in around 1980, reprocessing was not pursued. In addition, Finland has nuclear plants introduced by the East and West, and the anti-nuclear movement was divided. Finland could decide the radioactive waste disposal site plan for the first time in history. One of the reasons for Finland’s decision can be said that in the context of the Cold War, a strong nationwide anti-nuclear movement was absent.
View full abstract