The concept of sustainable development has basically penetrated society as a political consensus. This concept, however, is still so vague as to be fragile. The surface of this consensus conceals possible serious conflict of interests centering on true and precise understandings of sustainability, involving the deep relationship between humans and nature. As resources and environmental constraints become more obvious, intergenerational equity issues and international security concerns will become more serious. J. S. Mill advocates that the increase of wealth is not boundless and progress is limited within the stationary state. The Club of Rome clarifies that “overshoot” cannot be resolved only by technologies and markets. Here, we are aware of getting rid of a growth-oriented society in favor of human life in sound communities, attaching importance to solidarity of the people, given decreasing population and accelerated aging. In the great transformation from the growth-oriented society, non-hierarchical mass-collaboration, to be encouraged by an advanced communication system, may initiate the formation of a new humanistic and co-creative community, where establishment of well-being indicators formulated by the people will play a basic role.
View full abstract