In this paper, I have analyzed three examinations of procedural knowledge on "Velocity Context", "Duration Context", and "Distance Context". "Velocity Context" is judged by duration and distance, "Duration Context" is judged by distance and velocity, and "Distance Context" is judged by velocity and duration. The subjects are 227 pupils of 5 elementary schools in Kobe and their grades are from four to six.
I have conducted Guttman's scalogram analysis (White, B. W. & Saltz, E., 1957, pp.81-87) to three examinations, and validity of them is statistically confirmed by CR, MMR, and PPR. Also reliability of them is evidenced in terms of coefficient of reliability by KR-20.
As results of other analyses, I have clarified the following contents.
(1) There is a weak correlation between "Velocity Context" and "Duration Context", but not much between "Duration Context" and "Distance Context", or "Distance Context" and "Velocity Context".
(2) The result of F-test yielded significant value. : F(2, 225)=5856.883, p < .05.
(3) The result of multiple comparison tests of Ryan's procedure is the following for Table 1.
(1) For (Z_i-Y_i), the critical value is t_<1.67,226>=2.406, so t≒7.158 (p < .05).
(2) For (X_i-Y_i) and (Z_i-X_i), the critical value is t_<3.33,226>=2.134, so t=2.913 (p < .05).
So each absolute value on Table 1 has yielded significant value.
According to this result, it is said that chilren are easy to understand in order of "Distance Context", "Velocity Context", and "Duration Context".
(4) According to order of (3), Children have started from X_0Y_0 Z_0, passed through X_1Y_1Z_1, and got to X_2Y_2Z_2 as Figure 1 shows. In Figure 1, X, Y, and Z are "Contexts" like Table 1, and numbers of 0, 1, and 2 on X_1Y_0Z_2 et cetera show levels in respective "Contexts". Also numbers within round brackets are persons.
Table 1 Absolute Values of Subtraction among Mean Values on three "Contexts"
Figure 1 Deveropment of Procedural Knowledge on Velocity
抄録全体を表示