In the treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms (PCAs), a correct understanding of the microsurgical anatomy is of primary importance, i. e., the site and shape of the aneurysmal neck and the projection of the fundus in relation to the surrounding structures. However, in large or giant PCAs, the aneurysms are often too large to permit accurate anatomical analysis. We therefore retrospectively analyzed 102 normal-sized and directly operated PCAs, exclusive of the carotid ophthalmic and anterior wall aneurysms, and classified them on the basis of precise 3D angiographical and intraoperative findings.
The proposed classification system is composed of 1) carotid cave aneurysms (descending type, in situ type, ascending type), 2) posterior PCAs (posteromedial type, posterolateral type), and 3) anterolateral PCAs (ring proximal type, ring straddling type, ring distal type). We also argue that in PCA treatment, craniotomy surgery is more advisable than intravascular surgery because the former is the only method that allows the surgeon to precisely trace all of the perforators, to identify visual acuity-related perforators such as the superior hypophyseal artery, and to spare them when clipping the aneurysmal neck. In order to undertake the above-mentioned procedures safely and efficiently, we have found that using an air drill and the fine-tipped microsonocurette that we have improved for refined microsurgical use have proven to be most helpful. Especially in the operation of anterolateral PCAs, this microsonocurette is a “real must” for the safe removal of the anterior clinoid process which tightly covers the whole aneurysm.
View full abstract