International Journal of Curriculum Development and Practice
Online ISSN : 2424-1415
Print ISSN : 1344-4808
ISSN-L : 1344-4808
22 巻, 2 号
選択された号の論文の7件中1~7を表示しています
  • Seiji FUKAZAWA
    2020 年 22 巻 2 号 p. 1-3
    発行日: 2020年
    公開日: 2022/03/09
    ジャーナル フリー
  • Yoshinori SHIMIZU
    2020 年 22 巻 2 号 p. 5-19
    発行日: 2020年
    公開日: 2022/03/09
    ジャーナル フリー
    Research on classroom instruction that crosses national boundaries provides researchers new insights for variables of interests in the development and improving of teaching and learning of school subjects. In particular, cross-national comparisons lead researchers to more explicit understanding of their own implicit theories about how teachers teach and how children learn the school subject in their local contexts as well as what are going on in teaching the subject in other countries. The current paper illustrates how the study of classroom instruction from an international perspective informs researchers of the significance of the values attached to the school subject taught in the classrooms, by referring to 1) an international study of the practices and associated meanings in mathematics classrooms taught by competent teachers, The Learner’s Perspective Study (LPS), and 2) an ongoing project, The Lexicon Project, which aims to document and compare the naming systems of mathematics teachers of classroom events. The author argues that by exploring a “good” lesson of each school subject from the learners’ perspective together with identifying pedagogical vocabulary shared by teachers from the teacher’s perspective, the role and significance of the school subject appear.
  • Chunli ZHANG
    2020 年 22 巻 2 号 p. 21-31
    発行日: 2020年
    公開日: 2022/03/09
    ジャーナル フリー
    In many countries' classrooms, the effectiveness of teaching was influenced by the confliction between the teacher's understanding of students and the students' understanding about themselves. To achieve effective teaching, teachers should have full understanding about teaching activities, students' reactions and the meaning behind the activities. By analyzing classroom behaviors and the meaning behind them, the learner's perspective study (LPS) is applied to understand students and explore the relationship between “teaching” and “learning”. Thus, the math class could be reconstructed and explained from the learners' perspective. Through continuous, learner-focused observation, it is easier to know students in our research. Above aspects in our research complements traditional teacher-focused classroom research. However, besides observation from learner's perspective, we also need to design teaching activities from learner's perspective. Frist, teachers should focus on learners to design teaching process according to students' learning path. Further, through learner-focused observation and classroom reconstruction, teachers could understand how real learning occurs and to implement effective teaching based on above finding. For this reason, we propose a “teaching process design”, which consists of driving problem, anchor task and diagnostic evaluation. It provides a research cycle consists with instructional design, classroom observation and feedback improvement, and finally explores how real learning occurs. First of all, how to design the driving problem? To design driving problems from the perspective of learners, we should pay attention to every student. The learner is no longer an abstract concept, but every student in the class. Each student has his own personalized learning path, and the learning paths of all students form a collective path. Therefore, the driving problem should turn the key knowledge into exploratory and challenging questions, and make students think actively. At the same time, hierarchical problems, which meet the collective learning path of students, should be gradually proposed and lead students to the essence of the knowledge. After the driving problems have motivated students' interest, the anchor tasks are taken as scaffold for students to solve above problems in class. In order to get more information from the perspective of learners through classroom observation, we need explicit tasks to identify students' performance. During explicit tasks solving procedures, students could look for ideas through explicit operations; also, teachers could understand the student's learning path from their explicit behavior such as attitude, expression, action and product. Finally, through diagnostic feedback, the classroom conversation will be reconstructed to reach the real thinking of students. Through dialogue diagnose, we could find out the critical points in learners' learning path, which influence the learner's thinking improvement under the perspective of learners. With the help of “teaching process design”, students could experience the procedure of problem-based learning, which drive student explore problems based on their original knowledge and life experience; in addition, teachers could propose coherent anchor tasks as scaffold for students to promote their problem solving ability gradually, which helps students to realize the insight of knowledge; finally, through comparing between the perspective of learners and teachers in classroom reconstruction, we could find the critical points of students, which could help teachers make preparations for the next class.
  • Youngcook Jun
    2020 年 22 巻 2 号 p. 33-46
    発行日: 2020年
    公開日: 2022/03/09
    ジャーナル フリー
    Mathematics is quite important for all students for promoting national and individual development. In this paper, I start with the general question regarding mathematics pedagogy; “How do we provide them curriculum and instruction so that they can grow up with learning an easier, a more interesting, a more meaningful mathematics to themselves?” To make things clear, I first introduce the pedagogical exemplary cases for Korean math learning and teaching based on qualitative approach after reviewing aShi short history of curriculum revision in Korea. Having the successive revision path in 1973, 1997 and 2011, the 2015 Revised National Curriculum affected the Math curriculum more significantly to math teachers and students. It aimed at nurturing a creative and integrative learner, as part of the central goals to normalize public education. I highlighted a case where a dedicated math teacher had been struggled with her students in math classroom since a novice teacher (Jun, Jung, & Shin, 2016).    The second part of this paper deals with several cases of utilizing such tools for computational thinking such as NetLogo and Mathematica. As known for computational modeling tool, NetLogo is quite useful for promoting mathematics learning with computational thinking capabilities. Mathematica is another useful tool for both teachers and students. This computer algebra system is designed for the students to enhance their computational thinking skills by exploring algorithms for solving calculus problems, for example. At the end, I present Korean cases of utilizing such tools for the science education center for the gifted and university classroom situations. Those cases will be possibly adopted in other international classrooms, especially in Japan as well.
  • Shin ITO
    2020 年 22 巻 2 号 p. 47-51
    発行日: 2020年
    公開日: 2022/03/09
    ジャーナル フリー
    This paper aimed to clarify the nature of research on curriculum and instruction in Japan, especially regarding music education. First, a summary of the historical development of curriculum and instruction research in Japan was given, and the framework of research on music education was provided, with the concept of musicology and music practice; prerequisite for research was shown. Next, two typical researches were reviewed, taking into account the background, research objectives, subjects, methods, and educational contribution. Both these researches were conducted in the context of subject learning and were beneficial to researchers and practitioners in all school subjects. Finally, with reference to the recent research trend, the nature of research on curriculum and instruction in Japan was derived: having aspects of both research and practice, dealing with issues about lesson practice, and possibility of being relevant to most school subjects.
  • Bin ZHOU
    2020 年 22 巻 2 号 p. 53-62
    発行日: 2020年
    公開日: 2022/03/09
    ジャーナル フリー
    The premise of teachers to be professional is to possess specialized knowledge. It can neither come from subject knowledge nor from education knowledge, but comes from possessing professional subject pedagogy. Subject pedagogy is from “the discipline of pedagogy knowledge transformation” and “learner-centered expression” in the classroom teaching. Subject pedagogy can help teachers to realize the scientific function and the educational value jointly in the teaching process. The process of subject pedagogy specialization, on the one hand, reflects the theoretical construction knowledge; on the other hand, is a discipline knowledge education function appeared in practice. Thus, subject pedagogy knowledge depends mainly on the depth of subject knowledge, the understanding of students’ overall knowledge and the real comprehension of the educational situation.
  • Youngdal CHO, Sunghyeok PARK
    2020 年 22 巻 2 号 p. 63-75
    発行日: 2020年
    公開日: 2022/03/09
    ジャーナル フリー
feedback
Top