The 8020 health score had been developed for screening of oral health condition in local residents, based on keeping more than 20 natural teeth until the age of 80 years. This study investigated the efficacy of this score in a workplace. We compaced the questionnaire for the 8020 health score and Morimoto's health score to evaluate the general health of 459 workers in a workplace. The results were as follows. 1. A score of 0-4, meaning bad life style, was assessed at the highest rate (77.8%) among the respondents among the three evaluation levels of Morimoto's health score. 2. On 8020, however, more than 16, meaning good, was seen in 28.0%, 11-15, meaning intermediate, was found in 46.5% and less than 10, meaning bad, was found in 25.8%. 3. Only "working form" among the 10 parameters, was significantly related to the total 8020 health score. 4. There were some items on the 8020 health score which related significantly to each score : "sex", "age", "working contents", "working form", "commuting method" and "existence of chronic disease". 5. 8020 health score was significantly correlated with Morimoto's health score except for the item about smoking (Spearman's correlation coefficient : 0.361, p<0.001). 6. Subject ranked higher on Morimoto's scale on 7 of the 8020 items, except items about smoking in those rated good. These finding suggested that the 8020 health score is useful for to estimating oral health in the workplace.
View full abstract