巻号一覧
2006 巻 (2006)
- 217 号 p. 1-
- 216 号 p. 1-
前身誌
2006 巻, 216 号
選択された号の論文の5件中1～5を表示しています
- |<
- <
- 1
- >
- >|
-
武内 孝善2006 年 2006 巻 216 号 p. 1-44,168
発行日: 2006/03/21
公開日: 2010/03/12
ジャーナル フリーThe purpose of this paper is to throw light on Kukai's achievements in the final years of his life, a subject with almost no prior research. Examining his last years, there is something unique. For over two months starting from the nineteenth day of the twelfth month of 834, Kukai received five imperial charters (_??__??_) including one for the Goshichinchi Mishuho (_??__??__??__??__??__??_). In the background of this was likely some consideration of the continuity of Shingon-shu following his death. Since the reviewing procedures for approving an imperial charter took several months to half a year for each case, the question that must be asked is why could have received five in a short period. He was near the end of his life, and his warm relations with the clerics of the great Nara temples have been noted, but that alone is an inadequate explanation. I believe it was the product of the political skills and personal contacts Kukai developed after his return from Tang China. First, he did not go through normal bureaucratic channels but rather presented a memorial directly to the emperor to receive his imperial charter. Second, one of Kukai's supporters (_??__??_) was Fuj iwara no Mimori (_??__??__??__??_, 785-840), who served as the shokei (_??__??_) at the time the imperial charter was granted. In simple terms, Mimori was intimate with the court and may have interceded for Kukai, allowing his requests to be processed smoothly. In any event, the five matters the imperial charters concern functioned as surprisingly well-integrated preparations for the future of Shingonshu, To-ji, and Koyasan.抄録全体を表示PDF形式でダウンロード (3077K) -
中谷 征充2006 年 2006 巻 216 号 p. 45-71,167
発行日: 2006/03/21
公開日: 2010/03/12
ジャーナル フリーKukai wrote five poems for the courtier, Yoshimine Yasuyo: Ryo Shoko ni okuru shi (_??__??__??__??__??_) Yama ni iru kyo (_??__??__??_), Sanchu ni nan no tanoshimi aruya (_??__??__??__??__??_), Itazura ni tama o idaku (_??__??__??_), Rahikan no uta (_??__??__??__??_). These five poems are included in the first fascicle of Kukai's Henjo hokki shoryo shu (_??__??__??__??__??__??__??_). All the poems were written at the same time, and the collection together forms a drama, which the present author attempts to arrange and interpret. The author intends to understand Kukai's purpose in writing these poems by examining the introductions to the poems. Based on a study of the phrasing of the poems themselves, a theory of when these poems were composed will be presented. These studies should lead to some understanding of Kukai as a man of letters. The result of this will be a glimpse of some of Kukai's joys and sorrows as he engaged in Buddhist practices both for his own sake and for the sake of others.抄録全体を表示PDF形式でダウンロード (1935K) -
下西 忠2006 年 2006 巻 216 号 p. 73-82
発行日: 2006/03/21
公開日: 2010/03/12
ジャーナル フリーPDF形式でダウンロード (680K) -
静 春樹2006 年 2006 巻 216 号 p. L5-L35,166
発行日: 2006/03/21
公開日: 2010/03/12
ジャーナル フリー本稿は、金剛乗がインド密教史にパラダイムシフトをもたらした問題を論じる。インド密教全体と金剛乗の関係は重層的に交錯している。筆者はこれまでに築かれた先学の研究に準拠してインド密教史を寸写し、インド仏教において金剛乗の範疇を別立する理由を論じる。次に、金剛乗を信解する阿闍梨たちが行った教判に触れ、インド密教史における時代区分に関する分析概念を提起する。この論述の過程で、我々にとって、厳密な定義は困難であるとしてもそのイメージは共有されていると考えてよい「密教」に相当する用語をインドの文献に探る。最後に、金剛乗と仏教タントリズムの概念上での同異を明らかにする。抄録全体を表示PDF形式でダウンロード (2461K) -
大観 慈聖2006 年 2006 巻 216 号 p. L36-L77,167
発行日: 2006/03/21
公開日: 2010/03/12
ジャーナル フリーRatnakarasanti, who flourished around the end of the 10th and the beginning of the 11th century during the final period of Indian Buddhism, was introduced as one of the Siddhas in the Caturasitisiddhapravrtti (Song and Histories of the Eighty-Four Buddhist Siddhas), and was familiar with both the paramitanaya and the mantranaya. He was the keeper of the east gate of Vikramasila Monastery, one of six gatekeepers. In the present paper, the author will treat the Kusumañjali—the commentary by Ratnakarasanti on the Guhyasamajatantra (GST)—as the primary source for understanding how Ratnakarasanti interpreted the GST. On the composition of GST, the author will attempt to establish the relationship among the three kinds of tantra—hetutantra, phalatantra, and upayatantra—and the angacatustaya or caturvidha-upaya-seva, upasadhana, sadhana, and mahasadhana. According to the Kusumañjali, Ratnakarasanti interpreted the term “guhyasamaja” as referring to “bhagavad-mahavajradhara” and to the GST. The author will attempt an investigation of the formation of the GST through an analysis of a recent interpretation and descriptions in the GST (chapter 18, verse 24, pada c and d).抄録全体を表示PDF形式でダウンロード (3161K)
- |<
- <
- 1
- >
- >|