Analytical methods of polychlorinated dibenzo-
p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDDs/DFs) in bottom sediments and aquatic organisms (shellfish) were evaluated. Two extracting processes were comparatively applied to air-dried river sediment; Soxhlet extraction with toluene (SXE) and alkaline digestion at room temperature followed by extraction with
n-hexane (ALE) . The extracts were cleaned-up on silica-gel, alumina, and activated carbon columns in the same way.
Both processes provide almost the same distribution patterns of PCDDs/DFs homologues and congeners. For sediment analysis, therefore, ALE is considered to possess an almost equall extracting efficiency to conventional SXE.
However, the HpCDFs and OCDF data in duplicate measurements using ALE had a wider variation than using SXE. Moreover, the HpCDDs/DFs and OCDD/DF recoveries of internal standard substances labeled with
13C isotopes were dropped in ALE process. ALE process in organism analysis had also a same tendency of losses of internal standards. From an instability of highly chlorinated PCDDs/DFs to strong alkaline even at room temperature, alkaline treatment should be handled with care in PCDDs/DFs analysis.
Furthermore, actual PCDDs/DFs data of bottom sediment and freshwater snail taken at one site of a river were compared. The ratio of organism concentration (pg/g-wet) divided by sediment concentration (pg/g-dry) was used as a bioavailability index. It decreased, on the whole, with an increase in the substituted chlorine number of PCDDs/DFs, that is, highly chlorinated PCDDs/DFs were relatively more present in sediment rather than in organism. OCDD/DF showed approximately a tenth the ratio of 1, 3, 6, 8-TeCDD.
View full abstract