Vietnam's forest tenure system has changed since 1994 owing to the continued forest loss: Protection and production forests, instead of being directly managed and used by the government, were allocated to individual households for management and development. Despite the new tenure policy, the new forest tenants in mountain regions-the most vulnerable group in the country-continued to extract forest resources and use forestland for growing crops. Subsequently, forest quality decreased. This study was conceptualized to determine the implementation of the policy in practice and the actual situation of utilization of forest resources and forestland among the forest tenants. A mountainous community in North Central Vietnam, where the new policy has been implemented, was chosen as case study. Both primary and secondary data were used. Primary data were derived from a questionnaire survey of 84 randomly-selected households (30% of the community's total households). The study found that implementation of the new policy in the community was arbitrary, inconsistent, and unfair. Consequently, forest tenants did not find incentives to manage and develop the allocated forests. No any households were found to invest, protect, or work on forests as being expected by the policy. They continued to extract forest resources for human and livestock daily used, and use forestland for agricultural purposes. Despite the policy, therefore, forest quality was continuously decreased. The study argued that the problem lay in two main causes, which were the continued forest dependence of the tenants and the discrepancy of the policy implementation. It suggested a focus on livelihood of local forest-dependant population, to change the current situation.
View full abstract