For the second revision of the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF), the U. S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the U. K. Institute of Geological Sciences (IGS), and the U. S. Geological Survey (USGS) submitted proposed models of the Earth's main magnetic field at 1965.0, 1970.0, 1975.0, and 1980.0, and its secular variation during 1980-1985. We assessed the proposed models by comparing them with annual mean values from worldwide magnetic observatories, data for 1978-1980 from 63 U. S. magnetic repeat stations, and rates-of-change values for worldwide magnetic observatories for 1965-1985 that were derived from straight lines fitted to annual means for five-year intervals. We also mutually compared the 1980 models.
For the observatory data, the IGS 1980 model yields an absolute mean residual in
X that is more than twice as great as that for any other model for any year, and that model yields an RMS residual in
Z of 246nT, compared with less than 193nT for the other two 1980 models. For the repeat station data, the IGS 1980 model yields an absolute mean residual in
F of 113nT, compared with about 30nT for the other two. The secular variation of
Z for 1975-1980 deduced from the IGS models, and for 1980-1985 from the NASA secular variation model, yield RMS residuals of 32 and 21nT/yr, respectively, when compared with the observatory rates-of-change values. The NASA and USGS 1980 models, both based on MAGSAT data, differ by no more than about 70nT, but the IGS 1980 model differs from the other two by more than 600nT in some places. This study suggests that the second revision of the IGRF should consist of means of the proposed models, with the exceptions of the IGS 1980 and the NASA 1980-1985 models.
抄録全体を表示