Concrete work is one of the main components for constructing irrigation and drainage projects. Not only so-called “industrialized countries” but also developing countries provide the ingredients needed to prepare the concrete.
Many projects have been implemented by use of local ingredients, with the guidance of expatriate engineers. However, the quality of concrete is lower than anticipated, resulting in shortening the useful life of hydraulic structures. This paper presents a case study of concrete prepared with local ingredients, in the work of cooperation in constructing an irrigation and drainage project in a semi-arid region. The study started by examining the conventional methods set forth in the specifications, followed by a field investigation at the project site. During this process, the following countermeasures were studied:
(1) Understanding the climatic and labor conditions.
(2) Comprehending the characteristics of each ingredient.
(3) Clarification of chemical and physical properties of cement.
(4) Installation of a treatment system for aggregates.
(5) Adoption of the weighing method for determining the mix proportion.
(6) Installation of testing equipment for quality control.
Based on these systematic procedures, the project provided the concrete for constructing both a few big structures and many small structures. Finally, it was concluded that:
(1) The concrete prepared with ingredients locally available had sufficient strength.
(2) Local cements showed slower and lower development of strength compared with those of Japan.
(3) An empirical formula developed in Japan was applicable to estimation of the mix proportion.
(4) Mixing amounts of admixture ingredients need to be modified based on experiments.
(5) Compressive strengths of concrete fluctuated considerably, so that normal distribution could not be applied.
(6) The greater part of data about slump values indicated smaller values (=7.5cm) than the target (=10cm).
(7) Sustainable quality control is needed to examine the compressive strength of concrete at 28 days of age, because of deficiencies of the conventional formula in evaluating the ratio of σ28/σ7.
(8) Wastage volume of concrete was estimated at 11%, nearly equal to the loss obtained through installation of small structures.
View full abstract