This paper aims to examine the disparity trends in study abroad opportunities according to university status.
With the globalization of economic activities and internationalization of higher education, the number of students studying abroad is increasing rapidly worldwide. In contrast, the number of long-term Japanese study abroad students is declining, and since the latter half of the 2000s, young people's inward orientation has been viewed as problematic. In response to this situation, the government has continuously launched policies encouraging Japanese students to study abroad and develop “global human resources. “ Consequently, the number of Japanese students enrolled in Japanese universities who participate in short-term study abroad programs of less than one year, especially super-short-term study abroad programs of one week to one month, has increased rapidly in recent years.
Regarding this increase in the number of study abroad students, research in Western countries and East Asia has regarded study abroad as a strategy of status attainment for the elite in the age of globalization, and the disparity in study abroad opportunities has been regarded as a problem from the perspective of social reproduction. However, despite a lack of evidence, the “massification of study abroad “ discourse has been shared by Japanese researchers and study abroad supporters. Therefore, there have been few studies that link the increase in the number of study abroad students to a widening disparity in study abroad opportunities within Japan. Nevertheless, the recent policy of prioritizing higher education internationalization may exacerbate the disparity in study abroad opportunities depending on the university to which the student belongs. Therefore, this paper analyzed disparity and its change over time in study abroad opportunities according to university status, focusing on large-scale study abroad opportunities of “less than 1 month, “ “6-12 months, “and “all term”, using data on changes in the number of study abroad students from each university. The key findings are as follows.
First, the number of “all term “ study abroad opportunities has increased since 2010 due to the rapid increase in “less than one month “ opportunities at both national and private universities. Second, while private universities have a higher coefficient of variation in study abroad opportunities than national universities, differences in coefficient of variation tended to shrink overall. Therefore, the expansion of study abroad opportunities, both national and private, is not biased toward a few universities, but is expanding at a broader range of universities. Third, the disparity according to university status in all “less than 1 month, “ “6-12 months, “and “all term “ opportunities at national universities emerged, and this is growing. In the case of private universities, although it was confirmed that the disparity according to university status was partially reduced, there was a widening disparity in “less than one month, “ “6-12 months, “ and “all term “ opportunities between some high-level universities and other universities.
Based on the foregoing, this paper contends that a series of policies governing internationalization of higher education promotes disparity in study abroad opportunities according to university status.
抄録全体を表示