The purpose of this study is, in consideration of up to date problems on nature conservation, to understand the structure of OPEN LAND with the following three aspects:
Open land as a basic element for planning
Open land as a basic element for planning
Open land as an element of environment
Aims of the study are to analyse the relation, between individual phenomenon and the structure, to, make clear the theoretical view point on OPEN LAND, and to find out some solutions for natural environmental conditions.
We came to realize that the feature of the structure' of OPEN LAND can be classified in its equalization of the quality of O.S as a basic element, as a part of cultural background, and as an element of environment. Contents of the equalization can be shown in a following manner:
1. Equalization of O.S as a basic element: innovation of the surface, demolishment of water ways, leveling of slopes:
2. Equalization of O.S as a part of cultural background: planting techniques construction means and design manner.
3. Equalization of O.S as an element of environment: Expansion of green-less housing areas and equalization of species of plants.
Following three stages should well be regarded, and the third stage should be taken into considration for the betterment of region oriented Open Land plannig.
1st stage: Function oriented plan for open space
2nd stage: Structure oriented plan for open space
3rd stage: Phase oriented plan for REGIONAL OPEN LAND
Individually specialized planning based upon the differenceof feature of regions should be developed. Problems and questions to be considered for the recovery of OPEN LAND are:
1. To make clear what are problems caused by the equalization of environment, and how they can be solved.
2. To make clear what problems caused by the multiplexization of environment, and how they can be solved.
3. To make clear what are caused by the subdivision of subjects and systems for environmental planning, and how they can be solved.
4. To make clear what are caused by the limitation of concepts of open spaces, and how they can be reformed.
Conclusion:
Directions of the recovery of OPEN LAND can be managed in two ways: the way for containinment of quality, and the way for development of both quality and quantity. In order to develop the means of that, ' systems' connected with the subjects of environment, 'mangement' of systems, and 'techniques' for the control of OPEN LAND should be well re-considered.
抄録全体を表示