This article, based on my research extending over more than three decades concerning the Qui former foragers in Southern Africa, considers how anthropological fieldwork can be an immediate experience. The G|ui and G||ana are closely-related dialect groups of Khoe-speaking people who have adapted to the harsh, dry environment of the Kalahari Desert. The point of departure for this investigation is the Goffmanian theory of microsociology that regards immediate co-presence as the most basic foundation for elucidating the structure of human face-to-face interactions. At the same time, special attention has been paid to William Faulkner's "Yoknapatawpha Saga," especially The Sound and the Fury and Absalom, Absalom!, since his avant-garde style and its unique temporality, among other factors, provide valuable clues for writing an ethnography that attempts to reconstruct past incidents. The strategy of the ethnographic descriptions I am pursuing is to grasp the oral discourse as some kind of `gesture' and to illuminate the emotional expression emerging from it. The strategy is inspired by the thinking of Maurice Merleau-Ponty, who regarded spoken words as "a genuine gesture" rather than the reproduction of mental representations. My analysis focuses on six cases involving formal interviews with seven persons (three G|ui men, a G|ui woman, a G||ana woman, and a married couple consisting of a G|ui husband and a Ghana wife) that had been recorded and videotaped from 1994 to 2005 at the Xade settlement in the Central Kalahari Game Reserve and the New Xade relocated village, both in Botswana. The cases cover such diverse ethnographic topics as a male initiation ritual, courtship, the death of the narrator's child, the experience of raising a mentally-retarded child, extramarital sexual relationships, and the birth of a baby whose father was unknown. For analytical tools, I relied on such well-known concepts as Bourdieu's habitus, Merleau-Ponty's inter-corporeality or style, and the 'enact/enactive/enaction' proposed by Varela et al. I also used two kinds of conceptual schema that I had proposed elsewhere, namely 'body configuration' and 'co-membership.' As for the first, the human perception of any incident is based on a particular body configuration whose substance consists of postural and/or proxemic arrangements, or peculiar patterns of interaction between participants. Through the iteration of recounting a past incident, the body configuration is crystallized into a relatively invariant mental image that reifies the 'core' meaning of the incident. As for the second, in speech act theory, an 'assertive' family of illocutionary acts deserves special attention, for an act of assessment always entails a triadic relationship among the speaker, hearer, and referent. The assessment value of an utterance varies according to how the speaker and hearer, respectively, cast the 'net of co-membership' to any one of three possible dyads constituting the above triad: namely, speaker/referent, hearer/referent, and speaker/hearer. The following seven points were abstracted from the discourse analysis of the above six cases: - When some kinship address terms, such as "grandpa" or "gandma," are used as interjections, expressive tones become prominent that are irreducible to formal semantics. - The scene of immediate co-presence, in which both the G|ui (G||ana) informant and the researcher participate, is immersed in the habitus (or inter-corporeality) peculiar to their societal lives. - The bodily action of a narrator `enacts' some unique pattern of body configuration that symbolizes the essential meaning of a past event, such as a ritual. - In an interview with one informant, the multiple facets of reality are illuminated through cross-referencing to another
(View PDF for the rest of the abstract.)
View full abstract