In this study, an office work machine which comprises of 6 processes was examined by working factor to classify the working structure. Then, proficiency in 6 single works and 3 combined works (cell productions) was analyzed using the work achievement method, and the evaluation index was presented.
The results are summarized as follows.
(1) The evaluation of proficiency in work achievement Q showed that proficiency was 74.68% in each single work, 71.70% in combined work A accompanied by bodily labor, 65.52% in combined work B accompanied by intellectual labor, and 68.53% in combined work C accompanied by both bodily and intellectual labor. In short, combined work C approximated the average of combined work A and B.
(2) It is shown that there was negative correlation between rate of variability δ and tendency index b ; that is, when rate of variability δ decreased, tendency index b increased in all works. On the examination of the correlation, significance was observed.
(3) The evaluation index was presented by which proficiency was easily assessed and evaluated in each single work and cell production.
View full abstract