We evaluated strength at the road surface and bank using soil compaction tests and penetration tests at 24 points on six roads in Kami-City. Two types of spur roads, such as those designed for trucks or forwarders, were observed in this study. The earth works construction methods were divided into two types: (1) cutting and banking at the same location and (2) surface soil removal by wide cutting, followed by re-banking for construction of the road body. Through evaluation of soil compaction and penetration tests, we found that most spur roads exhibit less road body strength than public roads do. The ratio of compaction in spur roads was less than 85%, which is the value expected for public roads. Mixing removed soil with coarser soil and using the mixture for construction of the road body can be used to control the moisture content, as well as the maximum compaction characteristics, of road soil. Additionally, soil transportation in heavy vehicles during construction can enhance compaction. To improve spur road construction methods, better methods for on-site determination of soil type, moisture ratio, and soil compaction ratio without the need for laboratory tests are needed.
View full abstract