This investigation was made for the purpose of figding out the seasonal variations in soil moisture due to various topographical posisions. The writer, to this end, laid down three plots in the forest of “Hiba” (
Thujopsis dolabrata Sieb. et Zucc.) on the Tsugaru Peninsula, Plot A (ridge), B (middle slope) and C (lower slope), took samples from each horizon of these plots and measured their moisture content. (See the paper in Japanese)
Supposing edaphic factor was constant, the amount of soil moisture would be influenced chiefly by climatic factor and that above all by precipitation and evaporation which are respectively producer and consumer of moisture content in soil. Therefore, he calculated the correlattion coefficients of precipitation and evaporation to moisture content and compared the degree of this correlation. (See ditto.)
Though the results did not show too high correlations, he found certain correlations (20% point), with amount of precipitation at H layer in plot B and at B
1 and C
2 horizons in C, and with evaporation at B
l and B
2 in A, and at A
1 and B
1, in C.
These results indicate that the plot A has little relation with precipitation as it's surface has become hydrophobic, in plot C, the lower layer is nearly saturated with water and below B
1 horizon it is correlated negatively with precipitation as there is a stream of soil water between A
2 and B
1 horizons and besides C horizon is impermeable, and in plot B, moisture absorptive power is fairy high and the effect of climatic factors upon soil decrease tradually from surface to lower layer.
It is natural that the nearer to the surface, the more powerful should be the effect of atmospheric phenomena upon soil, and that moisture content to rainfall should be correlated positively. But as the case stands now in the lower layers of plot B and those below B
1, of plot C the matters proved to be in negative correlations, which is considered to be due to the fact that those layers are influenced deeply not only by percolating water but also by free soil water, because they lie on the middle or lower part of the slope. Thus, the lower it lies on the slope, the upper in each profile appears the negative correlate position.
View full abstract