-
Article type: Cover
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
Cover16-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Cover
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
Cover17-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Index
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
Toc13-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Index
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
Toc14-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
[in Japanese]
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
I-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
II-IV
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
V-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
V-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
VI-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
VII-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
VIII-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
IX-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
IX-XI
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
XII-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
XIII-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
XIII-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
MASATO NAKAMURA
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
441-448
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
ISAO MURO
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
449-454
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
SHIGEHIKO KATSURAGAWA, [in Japanese]
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
455-459
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
EINOBU SUZUKI
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
460-469
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
YUJI OGATA
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
470-475
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
HIROKO NISHIDE
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
476-481
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
FUMINORI SHINOHARA, [in Japanese], [in Japanese]
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
482-483
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
TOSHIO HAYAKAWA
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
484-485
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
YURIKO HADA
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
486-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
KEIICHI MATSUMOTO, HIDEO OHNISHI, TAKASHI YOKOI, HIDEHARU NIIDA, YOSHI ...
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
487-493
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
The maximum likelihood expectation maximization (ML-EM) algorithm has become available as an alternative to filtered back projection in SPECT. The actual physical performance may be different depending on the manufacturer and model, because of differences in computational details. The purpose of this study was to investigate the character-istics of seven different types of ML-EM algorithms using simple simulation data. Seven ML-EM algorithm programs were used: Genie (GE), esoft (Siemens), HARP-III (Hitachi), GMS-5500U1 (Toshiba), Pegasys (ADAC), ODYSSEY-FX (Marconi), and Windows-PC (original software). Projection data of a 2-pixel-wide line source in the center of the field of view were simulated without attenuation or scatter. Images were reconstructed with ML-EM by changing the number of iterations from 1 to 45 for each algorithm. Image quality was evaluated after a reconstruction using full width at half maximum (FWHM), full width at tenth maximum (FWTM), and the total counts of the reconstructed images. In the maximum number of iterations, the difference in the FWHM value was up to 1.5 pixels, and that of FWTM, no less than 2.0 pixels. The total counts of the reconstructed images in the initial few iterations were larger or smaller than the converged value depending on the initial values. Our results for the simplest simulation data suggest that each ML-EM algorithm itself provides a simulation image. We should keep in mind which algorithm is being used and its computational details, when physical and clinical usefulness are compared.
View full abstract
-
TAKANORI HARA, HIDEKI KATO, MASATOSHI TSUZAKA
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
494-499
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
Image reconstruction in multislice spiral/helical computed tomography (MSCT)consists of a package of data on the arbitrary direction of the Z-axis that can be collected by active detector arrays. Thus the recombined data vary with each spiral pitch. In certain cases of spiral pitch, data compression can occur, and the spiral artifacts that are characteristic of MSCT would change. In our study, we evaluated image complications by fractal dimensions, because the geometrical patterns from a conic phantom are closely related to data'transfer in the direction of the Z-axis in spiral pitches. We hoped to establish useful spiral pitches and slice collimation for clinical use in a 4-row MSCT scanner. By employing a conic phantom of 120 mm in diameter and a cone angle of 100 degrees, we measured the fractal dimension of the conic phantom image by making a binary to outline from 2.0 to 8.0 of various slice collimations. Moreover, in order to evaluate the correlation between fractal dimensions and image artifacts, we confirmed the influence of spiral pitch and reconstruction slice thickness for clinical use. We found that, when the reconstruction slice thickness was the same, the cross section of the conic phantom that was from thin-slice collimations was more similar to an actual circle than that of wide-slice collimations. The former deserved a low value and showed slight changes, and, therefore, its fractal dimensions were fixed. As a phenomenon worthy of attention, when we employed wide-slice collimations(4x5.0 mm)during peculiar low spiral pitches of 2.5 to 3.0 fractal dimensions remained low and similar to an actual circle. By these analyses of the influence of data transfer in the direction of the Zaxis, we found that spiral pitch influenced the rate of slice collimation used for data acquisition closely to the reconstruction slice thickness. Based on these findings, when slice collimations and reconstruction slice thickness should be made equal, we estimated that spiral pitches of low image artifacts in 4row MSCT ranged from 2.5 to 3.0 using fractal dimensions. We consider that a new adaptation of fractal dimension analysis is possible when it is used as an index in determining protocols.
View full abstract
-
YOSHIHIKO HOSHINO, TAKAYUKI SUTOU, MICHIHARU SUZUKI, JYUNYA FUKUDA, HI ...
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
500-507
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
We performed experimental and clinical MR studies to determine the optimal imaging conditions for the uterine three-layer structure on fast spin-echo T_2-weighted imaging. In the experimental study, we used our original phantom. Imaging studies were carried out with different TRs, TEs, and ETLs, and the contrast-to-noise ratio(CNR)was evaluated. TR was the most important factor for contrast in both the phantom and clinical studies. The longer TR was, the better the contrast became. In the clinical study, TRs of 5500-6000 msec provided clear visualization of the uterine three-layer structure. Longer TRs would be useful for the detection of disease, differential diagnosis, and grading in patients with uterine diseases.
View full abstract
-
AKIO OGURA, AKIRA MIYAI, FUMIE MAEDA, HIROYUKI FUKUTAKE, RIKIYA KIKUMO ...
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
508-513
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
The signal-to-noise ratio(SNR)of a magnetic resonance image is a common measure of imager performance. However, evaluations for the calculation of the SNR use various methods. A problem with measuring SNR is caused by the distortion of noise statistics in commonly used magnitude images. In this study, measurement accuracy was compared among four methods of evaluating SNR according to the size and position of regions of interest (ROIs). The results indicated that the method that used the difference between two images showed the best agreement with the theoretical value. In the method that used a single image, the SNR calculated by using a small size of ROI showed better agreement with the theoretical value because of noise bias and image artifacts. However, in the method that used the difference between two images, a large size of ROI was better in reducing statistical errors. In the same way, the methods that used air noise and air signal were better when applied to a large ROI. In addition, the image subtraction process used to calculate pixel-by-pixel differences in images may reach zero on a minus pixel value when using an image processor with the MRI system and apparatuses associated with it. A revised equation is presented for this case. It is important to understand the characteristics of each method and to choose a suitable method carefully according to the purpose of the study.
View full abstract
-
TETSUO KIDA, HARUMI IGUCHI, KAZUO NOMA, MASAHIRO YOSHIMURA, MASANARI H ...
Article type: Article
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
514-521
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
Societies concerned with radioactive rays and nuclear medicine have recently highlighted the necessity of managing radioactive medical waste resulting from nuclear medicine examinations. We introduce a manual that we have created and explain its use in decision-making and management practices aimed at the reduction of radioactive medical waste at hospitals that have not yet solved this problem. We hope that our manual will help in reducing this medical waste.
View full abstract
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
522-524
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
525-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
525-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
RESTRICTED ACCESS
To protect personal information, PDF files cannot be viewed.
View full abstract
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
526-529
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
530-562
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
563-576
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
577-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
578-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
578-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
578-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
578-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
578-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
578-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
578-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
App13-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
App14-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
App15-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Appendix
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
App16-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS
-
Article type: Cover
2003 Volume 59 Issue 4 Pages
Cover18-
Published: April 20, 2003
Released on J-STAGE: June 30, 2017
JOURNAL
FREE ACCESS