Objective : We evaluated the diagnostic cytological usefulness of different methods of cancer cell collection in chromatin stainability.
Study Design : Of patients diagnosed with ordinary pancreatic ductal carcinoma at Kurume University Hospital in January through December 2005, we studied 18 who had undergone endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP), in which a cannula was inserted to the vicinity of the lesion, and allowed multiple collections of cells, providing 57 specimens. To collect specimens, we conducted pure pancreatic juice cytology (PPJC), pancreatic duct brush cytology (PBC), brush wash cytology (BWC), and pancreatic ductal lavage cytology (PLC). Chromatin stainability was expressed in chromatin smudging or condensation.
Results : Chromatin smudging or condensation was observed in 54% (6/11) by PPJC, 43% (6/14) by PBC, 7% (1/14) by BWC, and 30% (3/10) by PLC. PPJC, BWC, and PWC resulted in chromatin condensation by digestive enzymes and PBC in chromatin smudging due to drying after smears were prepared.
Conclusion : Different sampling produced different chromatin-staining patterns, and BWC has a high possibility of obtaining easily evaluated cancer cells.
View full abstract