Accurate determination of ABO blood type is important to the prevention of hemolytic transfusion side effects. With the cisAB type, A and B genes are present on one chromosome. Three types are known to exist in combination with the other chromosomes. In ABO blood type testing, discrepancies between the front and back tests may occur, making accurate determination difficult in some cases.
In the present case, the gel column agglutination method showed anti-A (4+), anti-B (0), anti-D (4+), control (0) in the front test, and A1 blood cells (0), B blood cells (0) in the back test, resulting in a discrepancy between the front and back tests. On retesting with the test tube method, the front test showed anti-A (4+), anti-B (3+) and the back test showed A1 blood cells (0), B blood cells (w+). It was therefore decided to put the testing on hold. Since differences in agglutination strength were observed between anti-B and B blood cells in the gel column agglutination method and test tube method, we referred the case to the Japanese Red Cross Society for ABO subtype testing, and the final diagnosis came back as cisAB type.
Here, we report this first case of cisAB type testing we have experienced in which the results varied depending on the testing method used.
View full abstract