There has been a steady increase in demand for dentures as Japan becomes a geriodon tological society. The use of thermoplastic synthetic resins for dental prostheses has drawn wide attention, and is now part of the Japanese National Dental Examination. Be cause these nonmetal clasp dentures are metalfree, they are safe for patients allergic to these materials. However, the reality is that, although nonmetal clasp dentures have su perior esthetics and comfort, there is little information on their use and design. We sur veyed dentists working at Osaka Dental University to ascertain their attitudes toward non metal clasp dentures, and examined how their experience treating edentulism with this type of prosthesis affected their attitude toward this treatment. The survey participants were 53 dentists (31 males and 22 females) from the Depart ment of Removable Prosthodontics and Occlusion and the Department of Geriatric Den tistry of the Osaka Dental University. They were asked to compare characteristics such as esthetics, comfort, odor, modifications to the natural teeth (i.e., the amount of natural tooth structure that needed to be removed), stress on the gingivae (i.e., cleansability of the marginal gingivae), strength, difficulty of denture adjustments, tooth mobility, deterio ration of the material, and denture design. In addition, the patients were asked to com pare satisfaction with the nonmetal clasp dentures compared with conventional remov able partial dentures, and were asked whether they would recommend this new treatment modality. Each of the dentists answers was then crossexamined against his or her clini cal experience with this new type of dental prosthesis. Of the 53 dentists, 19 had previously made nonmetal clasp dentures for their patients (hereinafter referred to as “experienced dentists”) and 34 had not (“inexperienced den tists”). In both groups, about 60% of the dentists, regardless of whether they had clinical experience, rated nonmetal clasp dentures highly for their esthetics, appropriateness for patients allergic to metal, and the satisfaction of their patients. Since nonmetal clasp dentures are appropriate for patients allergic to metal and for those dissatisfied with metal clasps, it can be inferred that both the experienced and inexperienced dentists were in agreement. In contrast, regardless of their clinical experience, most dentists gave nonmetal clasp dentures low ratings for their burden on the gingivae, their lack of strength, their difficulty of adjustment, the extent to which they caused tooth mobility,and the rapid degradation of the denture base material. Regardless of their clinical experience, the dentists differed on denture design and their evaluation on the stress on the natural teeth. This suggests that, while both groups of dentists were aware of the shortcomings of nonmetal clasp dentures, even the experi enced practitioners did not have a clear rationale for design of the prostheses. One finding that supports this conclusion is that, in both groups, about 60 percent of the dentists were uncertain as to whether they should recommend nonmetal clasp dentures to their patients. Regardless, most participants agreed that there would be increased demand for nonmetal clasp dentures. Therefore, further efforts should be made to improve this treat ment. (J Osaka Dent Univ 2016 ;50 : 85-92)
抄録全体を表示